Question Tag: Tax Appeal Tribunal

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

ATAX – May 2022 – L3 – Q6 – Taxation of Non-Resident Companies and Individuals

Discuss the tax implications of an overseas branch and compute the associated tax liabilities.

Maigona Agro Limited is a Nigerian company operating in the agricultural sector. It has a large expanse of land in the Northern part of the country, which is used strictly for the cultivation of cotton seeds. As a result of the collapse of the textile/garment industry, specifically due to the unfavourable business climate in Nigeria, the company in 2015 established a branch, BAM Textile Mills, in the United Kingdom. Part of the cotton produced locally is sold to BAM Textile Mills at a competitive price, for the production of finished product (branded textile clothing).

A tax dispute recently arose between the Management of Maigona Agro Limited and officials of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) on the correct assessment of profits made by BAM Textile Mills. The Managing Director is of the opinion that the tax paid by BAM Textile Mills in the United Kingdom should be the final tax since the company is only an overseas branch. He further averred that the provisions of the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (as amended) are only applicable to companies incorporated in Nigeria. The Managing Director was furious when the company received a reminder of notice of assessment from the FIRS and has therefore threatened to approach the Tax Appeal Tribunal for redress.

You have been engaged by the company as its Tax Consultant to provide professional advice on the tax implication of the profit made by BAM Textile Mills, UK and possibly representation at the Tax Appeal Tribunal sittings. The statement of profit or loss for the year ended October 31, 2021 (BAM Textile Mills’ result has been converted to Nigerian Naira at the prevailing exchange rate) and other relevant documents were handed over to you by the Managing Director.

The extracts from the statements of profit or loss of the two corporate entities revealed the following:

Maigona Agro Ltd (N’000) BAM Textile Mills (N’000) Total (N’000)
Gross Turnover 975,100 1,820,500 2,795,600
Less:
Cost of materials/inputs 350,200 672,000 1,022,200
Salaries and Wages 122,530 400,400 522,930
Administrative Expenses 45,700 110,900 156,600
Depreciation 75,600 147,300 222,900
Donation 8,500 0 8,500
Share of Head Office Expenses 33,300 50,000 83,300
Income Tax Paid in the UK 0 72,200 72,200
Total Expenses 635,830 1,452,800 2,088,630
Net Profit 339,270 367,700 706,970

Additional Information:

  1. The capital allowances of Maigona Agro Limited in respect of plant and equipment, farming tools, and other qualifying capital expenditure as agreed with the tax authorities was N45,000,000. The amount of capital allowances of N57,000,000 claimable by BAM Textile Mills on qualifying assets was also certified by the tax authorities.
  2. Included in the donation was N5,000,000 given to victims of the COVID-19 (Omicron variant) pandemic in Nigeria.
  3. The UK tax rate is assumed to be 35%.

Required:

a. Advise the management of Maigona Agro Limited on the tax implications of the overseas branch. (4 Marks)
b. Compute the tax liabilities of the company in line with your submission in (a) above. (11 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "ATAX – May 2022 – L3 – Q6 – Taxation of Non-Resident Companies and Individuals"

TAX – May 2017 – L2 – SB – Q4 – Tax Dispute Resolution

Explanation of options available to the Revenue Authority and the taxpayer in tax disputes, including jurisdiction of appeals and court conditions.

Jandon is a Nigerian who lived abroad for many years and recently returned to establish a business in Nigeria. He appointed your firm to audit his financial statements. Jandon prepared his own tax computations for the year ended December 31, 2014, and submitted the returns to the Revenue Authority. However, the tax returns have been disputed by the Revenue Authority.

Required:

a. Explain the options open to the Revenue Authority on receipt of a Letter of Objection. (2 Marks)

b. Outline the content of a Notice of Objection. (3 Marks)

c. Describe the jurisdiction of the Tax Appeal Tribunal. (6 Marks)

d. List the conditions to be fulfilled for an appeal to the Federal High Court to be valid. (4 Marks)

e. Identify the options available to an aggrieved taxpayer dissatisfied with the Federal High Court’s decision. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – May 2017 – L2 – SB – Q4 – Tax Dispute Resolution"

TAX – May 2017 – L2 – SB – Q2 – Tax Administration and Enforcement

Explanation of transactions requiring a Tax Clearance Certificate and the procedures for hearing an appeal before the Tax Appeal Tribunal.

a. Mr. Bull Dozer has just submitted his application for an export license to the Nigerian Export Promotion Council. The Council demanded a Tax Clearance Certificate before granting him the export license.

Mr. Bull Dozer was concerned and approached you to explain whether the presentation of this document is required for all government transactions in Nigeria.

Required:
State TEN transactions in respect of which a Tax Clearance Certificate may be demanded by a government agency. (10 Marks)

b. The Tax Appeal Tribunal has the authority to adjudicate on tax disputes and controversies when the appellant does not discontinue the appeal.

Required:
List TEN procedures for hearing the appeal before the Tax Appeal Tribunal. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – May 2017 – L2 – SB – Q2 – Tax Administration and Enforcement"

TAX – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q2c – Tax Administration and Enforcement

This question involves advising on the proper procedure to challenge an outrageous tax assessment served by FIRS.

As a Tax Consultant, the Managing Director of your client brought an Assessment Notice served on the company by the Federal Inland Revenue Service complaining that the assessment was outrageous. You observed that the amount assessed was higher than the assessment based on the documents submitted by you.

Required:
State what you would advise your client to do under this circumstance.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q2c – Tax Administration and Enforcement"

TAX – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q2b – Tax Dispute Resolution

Explaining the procedure for an appeal against the decision of a Tax Appeal Tribunal.

Explain the procedure for an appeal against the decision of a Tax Appeal Tribunal.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q2b – Tax Dispute Resolution"

TAX – May 2021 – L1 – SA – Q8 – Tax Dispute Resolution

Objective question on the time frame for payment of tax payable as determined by the Tax Appeal Tribunal.

The tax payable as determined by the Tax Appeal Tribunal is payable within…………….of the date of notice of assessment, notwithstanding that an appeal may be pending on same, before the Federal High Court.
A. 6 months
B. 5 months
C. 3 months
D. 2 months
E. 1 month

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – May 2021 – L1 – SA – Q8 – Tax Dispute Resolution"

ATAX – May 2022 – L3 – Q6 – Taxation of Non-Resident Companies and Individuals

Discuss the tax implications of an overseas branch and compute the associated tax liabilities.

Maigona Agro Limited is a Nigerian company operating in the agricultural sector. It has a large expanse of land in the Northern part of the country, which is used strictly for the cultivation of cotton seeds. As a result of the collapse of the textile/garment industry, specifically due to the unfavourable business climate in Nigeria, the company in 2015 established a branch, BAM Textile Mills, in the United Kingdom. Part of the cotton produced locally is sold to BAM Textile Mills at a competitive price, for the production of finished product (branded textile clothing).

A tax dispute recently arose between the Management of Maigona Agro Limited and officials of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) on the correct assessment of profits made by BAM Textile Mills. The Managing Director is of the opinion that the tax paid by BAM Textile Mills in the United Kingdom should be the final tax since the company is only an overseas branch. He further averred that the provisions of the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (as amended) are only applicable to companies incorporated in Nigeria. The Managing Director was furious when the company received a reminder of notice of assessment from the FIRS and has therefore threatened to approach the Tax Appeal Tribunal for redress.

You have been engaged by the company as its Tax Consultant to provide professional advice on the tax implication of the profit made by BAM Textile Mills, UK and possibly representation at the Tax Appeal Tribunal sittings. The statement of profit or loss for the year ended October 31, 2021 (BAM Textile Mills’ result has been converted to Nigerian Naira at the prevailing exchange rate) and other relevant documents were handed over to you by the Managing Director.

The extracts from the statements of profit or loss of the two corporate entities revealed the following:

Maigona Agro Ltd (N’000) BAM Textile Mills (N’000) Total (N’000)
Gross Turnover 975,100 1,820,500 2,795,600
Less:
Cost of materials/inputs 350,200 672,000 1,022,200
Salaries and Wages 122,530 400,400 522,930
Administrative Expenses 45,700 110,900 156,600
Depreciation 75,600 147,300 222,900
Donation 8,500 0 8,500
Share of Head Office Expenses 33,300 50,000 83,300
Income Tax Paid in the UK 0 72,200 72,200
Total Expenses 635,830 1,452,800 2,088,630
Net Profit 339,270 367,700 706,970

Additional Information:

  1. The capital allowances of Maigona Agro Limited in respect of plant and equipment, farming tools, and other qualifying capital expenditure as agreed with the tax authorities was N45,000,000. The amount of capital allowances of N57,000,000 claimable by BAM Textile Mills on qualifying assets was also certified by the tax authorities.
  2. Included in the donation was N5,000,000 given to victims of the COVID-19 (Omicron variant) pandemic in Nigeria.
  3. The UK tax rate is assumed to be 35%.

Required:

a. Advise the management of Maigona Agro Limited on the tax implications of the overseas branch. (4 Marks)
b. Compute the tax liabilities of the company in line with your submission in (a) above. (11 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "ATAX – May 2022 – L3 – Q6 – Taxation of Non-Resident Companies and Individuals"

TAX – May 2017 – L2 – SB – Q4 – Tax Dispute Resolution

Explanation of options available to the Revenue Authority and the taxpayer in tax disputes, including jurisdiction of appeals and court conditions.

Jandon is a Nigerian who lived abroad for many years and recently returned to establish a business in Nigeria. He appointed your firm to audit his financial statements. Jandon prepared his own tax computations for the year ended December 31, 2014, and submitted the returns to the Revenue Authority. However, the tax returns have been disputed by the Revenue Authority.

Required:

a. Explain the options open to the Revenue Authority on receipt of a Letter of Objection. (2 Marks)

b. Outline the content of a Notice of Objection. (3 Marks)

c. Describe the jurisdiction of the Tax Appeal Tribunal. (6 Marks)

d. List the conditions to be fulfilled for an appeal to the Federal High Court to be valid. (4 Marks)

e. Identify the options available to an aggrieved taxpayer dissatisfied with the Federal High Court’s decision. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – May 2017 – L2 – SB – Q4 – Tax Dispute Resolution"

TAX – May 2017 – L2 – SB – Q2 – Tax Administration and Enforcement

Explanation of transactions requiring a Tax Clearance Certificate and the procedures for hearing an appeal before the Tax Appeal Tribunal.

a. Mr. Bull Dozer has just submitted his application for an export license to the Nigerian Export Promotion Council. The Council demanded a Tax Clearance Certificate before granting him the export license.

Mr. Bull Dozer was concerned and approached you to explain whether the presentation of this document is required for all government transactions in Nigeria.

Required:
State TEN transactions in respect of which a Tax Clearance Certificate may be demanded by a government agency. (10 Marks)

b. The Tax Appeal Tribunal has the authority to adjudicate on tax disputes and controversies when the appellant does not discontinue the appeal.

Required:
List TEN procedures for hearing the appeal before the Tax Appeal Tribunal. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – May 2017 – L2 – SB – Q2 – Tax Administration and Enforcement"

TAX – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q2c – Tax Administration and Enforcement

This question involves advising on the proper procedure to challenge an outrageous tax assessment served by FIRS.

As a Tax Consultant, the Managing Director of your client brought an Assessment Notice served on the company by the Federal Inland Revenue Service complaining that the assessment was outrageous. You observed that the amount assessed was higher than the assessment based on the documents submitted by you.

Required:
State what you would advise your client to do under this circumstance.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q2c – Tax Administration and Enforcement"

TAX – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q2b – Tax Dispute Resolution

Explaining the procedure for an appeal against the decision of a Tax Appeal Tribunal.

Explain the procedure for an appeal against the decision of a Tax Appeal Tribunal.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q2b – Tax Dispute Resolution"

TAX – May 2021 – L1 – SA – Q8 – Tax Dispute Resolution

Objective question on the time frame for payment of tax payable as determined by the Tax Appeal Tribunal.

The tax payable as determined by the Tax Appeal Tribunal is payable within…………….of the date of notice of assessment, notwithstanding that an appeal may be pending on same, before the Federal High Court.
A. 6 months
B. 5 months
C. 3 months
D. 2 months
E. 1 month

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "TAX – May 2021 – L1 – SA – Q8 – Tax Dispute Resolution"

error: Content is protected !!
Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan