Topic: Mergers and acquisitions

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

FM – May 2016 – L3 – Q4 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Estimating the additional equity value created by combining two companies and analyzing the impact of premium increases on shareholders.

Eko Product Plc (EP Plc) is a producer of a variety of vegetable oil and other household products in Lagos. The company presently faces significant competition in the market for one of its major raw materials – palm oil. To secure a regular flow of the raw material, the Directors of EP Plc are now considering making an offer for the entire share capital of Benin Oil Plc (BO Plc), a palm oil producing company in Benin.

The following financial information is provided for the two companies:

Parameter EP Plc BO Plc
Equity beta 1.2 1.2
Asset beta 0.9 1.2
Number of shares (million) 210 200
Current share price N29 N12

It is thought that combining the two companies will result in several benefits. It is estimated that combining the two companies will generate free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) of N1,080 million in current value terms, but these will increase by an annual growth rate of 5% for the next four years before reverting to an annual growth rate of 2.25% in perpetuity. In addition to this, combining the companies will result in cash synergy benefits of N100 million per year for the next four years. These synergy benefits are not subject to any inflationary increase, and no synergy benefits will occur after the fourth year.

The debt-to-equity ratio of the combined company will be 40:60 in market value terms and it is expected that the combined company’s cost of debt will be 4.55% before tax.

The income tax rate is 20%, the current risk-free rate of return is 2%, and the market risk premium is 7%. It can be assumed that the combined company’s asset beta is the weighted average of EP Plc’s and BO Plc’s asset betas weighted by their current market values.

EP Plc has offered to acquire BO Plc through a mixed offer of one of its shares for two BO Plc shares, plus a cash payment, such that a 30% premium is paid for the acquisition. Shareholders of BO Plc feel that a 50% premium would be more acceptable. EP Plc has sufficient cash reserves if the premium is 30%, but not if it is 50%.

You are required to:

(a) Estimate the additional equity value created by combining EP Plc and BO Plc based on the free cash flow to firm method. Comment on the results obtained and discuss briefly the assumptions made. (11 Marks)

(b) Estimate the impact on EP Plc’s equity holders if the premium paid is increased to 50% from 30%. (5 Marks)

c. Estimate the additional funds required if a premium of 50% is paid instead of 30% and discuss how this premium could be financed. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – SC – Q7 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Advise on the benefits, drawbacks, alternatives, and target selection criteria for expansion through mergers or acquisitions.

One of the means by which companies expand is through mergers and acquisitions. However, there are other means of expansion aside from these methods.

Inkline Plc. is one of your client companies intending to expand its business by means of merger or acquisition. Your firm of management consultants has been asked to advise the management of the company on what steps to take while considering the merger and acquisition methods, and whether it should go ahead with the expansion programme or otherwise.

Required:

a. (i) FOUR benefits derivable from its proposed means of expansion. (4 Marks)
(ii) THREE probable demerits of employing its proposed method of expansion. (3 Marks)

b. TWO alternatives to merger and acquisition in your report. (2 Marks)

c. Where the company decides to go ahead with either of these methods, indicate THREE criteria the company may consider in choosing its target company. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2019 – L3 – Q1 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Evaluate the synergy expected from a proposed merger between Pako Plc. and RT Plc. using free cash flow analysis, and discuss limitations and alternatives.

Pako Plc. will soon announce a take-over bid for Ronke Tina (RT) Plc., a company in the same industry. The initial bid will be an all-share bid of four Pako shares for every five RT Plc. shares. The most recent annual data relating to the two companies are shown below:

The take-over is expected to result in cost saving in advertising and distribution, reducing the operating costs (including depreciation) of Pako from 76% of sales to 70% of sales. The growth rate of the combined company is expected to be 6% per year for four years and 5% per year thereafter. RT’s debt obligations will be taken over by Pako. The corporate tax rate is expected to remain at 30%.

Sales and costs relevant to the decision may be assumed to be in cash terms.

Required:

a. Estimate how much synergy is expected to be created from the take-over, using free cash flow to the firm analysis for each individual company and the potential combined company. State clearly any assumptions that you make.
Note: The weighted average cost of capital of the combined company is assumed to be 9%. (20 Marks)

b. Discuss any five limitations of the above estimates. (5 Marks)

c. Explain, generally, three advantages and two disadvantages of expansion through merger and acquisition rather than through organic growth. (5 Marks)
(Total: 30 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2014 – L3 – SB – Q3 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Appraise Syntax Plc.'s proposed acquisition of Synapse Chemical Company based on forecast profits and provide a recommendation.

Syntax Plc., a fertilizer company, is concerned about fluctuating sales and earnings. This caused the management of the company to consider acquisition of another company in the same line of business.

In order to boost its sales and stabilize its earnings, Syntax Plc.’s management has identified Synapse Chemical Company Plc. as a possible target. Syntax proposed to acquire Synapse for a consideration of N20 million, which was agreed to by both companies.

Synapse’s expected future profits, as projected from its past financial records, are as follows:

Forecast Profits

Year Revenue (N’m) Cost of Sales (N’m) Other Expenses (N’m) Depreciation (N’m) Total Expenses (N’m) Profit Before Tax (N’m)
2015 60 30 15 5 50 10
2016 70 35 15 4 54 16
2017 78 39 15 4 58 20
2018 86 43 15 4 62 24
2019 94 47 15 4 66 28

The following information is relevant:

  1. The forecast profits have been limited to five years.
  2. All sales are for cash.
  3. The net book value of Synapse’s assets of N2 million is intended to be sold for N1 million in 2015. The expected loss from the disposal of these assets has been included in the depreciation for 2015. These assets currently have a tax written down value of N3 million. Capital allowances were claimed as at when due.
  4. Synapse currently has a tax liability of N4.5 million due for payment in 2015.
  5. The interest charges of N1 million of Synapse Plc. have been included in other expenses.
  6. In order to maintain the future earnings forecast of Synapse Chemical Company, Syntax Plc. needs to invest in capital expenditure.

7. Company income tax is currently at 30 percent, and the tax delay is one year.

8. The after-tax weighted average cost of capital has been calculated at 22%.

The management of Syntax Plc. has asked you, as a Financial Expert, to appraise the intended acquisition of Synapse Chemical Company Plc. and advise on the reasonableness of the acquisition. Your advice should be in the form of a report to the Board of Directors of Syntax Plc.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2021 – L3 – Q5 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Evaluate takeover bids from shareholder perspectives, assess failure to achieve synergies, and suggest risk minimisation steps.

Ponk Plc is a market research company. It has seen significant growth in recent years and obtained a stock market listing 5 years ago. Due to current economic and political turmoil in the country, there has been a significant drop in revenue and profit.

Ponk Plc is planning a takeover bid for XY, a rival market research company specialising in the telecommunication industry – an industry that has been very resistant to the current economic turbulence in the country. XY has an advanced information technology and information system which was developed in-house and which Ponk Plc would acquire the rights to use. Ponk Plc plans to adopt XY’s information technology and information system following the acquisition, and this is expected to be a major contributor to the overall estimated synergistic benefits of the acquisition. These benefits are believed to be worth ₦8 million (in cash flow) at the end of the first year of acquisition and growing annually at 5%.

Ponk Plc has 30 million shares in issue and a current share price of ₦69 before any public announcement of the planned takeover.
XY has 5 million shares in issue and a current share price of ₦128.40.
It is believed that the WACC of the combined company will be 15% p.a.

The directors of Ponk are considering 2 alternative bid offers:

  • Bid offer 1 – Share-based bid of 2 Ponk Plc shares for each of XY share.
  • Bid offer 2 – Cash offer of ₦135 per XY share.

Required:

a. Assuming synergistic benefits are realised, evaluate bid offer 1 and bid offer 2 from the viewpoint of:
(i) Ponk’s existing shareholders
(ii) XY’s shareholders. (6 Marks available for calculations)

b. Advise the directors of Ponk Plc on:
(i) The potential impact on the shareholders of both Ponk and XY of not successfully realising the potential synergistic benefits after the takeover. (6 Marks)
(Up to 4 marks are available for calculations)

(ii) The steps that could be taken to minimise the risk of failing to realise the potential synergistic benefits arising from the adoption of XY’s information technology and information system. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2023 – L3 – Q7 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Evaluate the share price of Obong plc under different growth scenarios and advise on the takeover bid. Explain EMH and its implications for the market.

Obong plc recently received a takeover bid from Abdul plc. If the bid for Obong plc is successful, it will provide Abdul plc the needed competitive edge in research and development to expand its laboratories into the production of the COVID-19 vaccine.

The shareholders of Obong plc will only accept an offer that meets a required return of 14% on their current shareholdings.

Obong plc recently paid a dividend of N20, and this is expected to grow at a rate of 7% for the foreseeable future.

Required:

a. Estimate the share price of Obong plc today. (2 Marks)

b. If Obong plc accepts the bid from Abdul plc, it is estimated that the new growth rate will rise to 12% for the first 3 years and thereafter stabilize at 7%. Calculate the new share price to the shareholders of Obong plc. (2 Marks)

c. As a financial advisor, recommend to the shareholders of Obong plc whether the offer from Abdul plc should be accepted. (2 Marks)

d. According to Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), it is believed that the market would react instantly and accurately to the merger announcement between Obong plc and Abdul plc.
Define briefly the THREE forms of EMH and their implications to the market. (9 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2023 – L3 – Q1b – Mergers and Acquisitions

Discuss the typical factors included in takeover regulations across countries.

b. The regulation of takeovers varies from country to country.

Outline the typical factors that such a regulation includes. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q7 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Advise Inkline Plc on expansion through mergers or acquisitions, potential benefits, demerits, alternatives, and target criteria.

One of the means by which companies expand is through mergers and acquisitions. However, there are other means of expansion aside from these methods.

Inkline Plc, one of your client companies, is intending to expand its business by means of a merger or acquisition. Your firm of management consultants has been asked to advise the management of the company on what steps to take while considering the merger and acquisition methods and whether it should go ahead with the expansion program or otherwise.

Required:

(a) Advise your client on:
(i) Four benefits derivable from its proposed means of expansion. (4 Marks)
(ii) Three probable demerits of employing its proposed method of expansion. (3 Marks)

(b) State two alternatives to merger and acquisition in your report. (2 Marks)

(c) Where the company decides to go ahead with either of these methods, indicate three criteria the company may consider in choosing its target company. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Advise on financial synergies from KP's acquisition of TE and evaluate cash vs. share-for-share offers.

You run a financial consultancy firm and have been approached by a new client for advice on a potential acquisition. Kola Plc (KP) is a large engineering company that was listed on the stock market ten years ago, with the founders retaining a 20% stake in the business. KP initially experienced rapid growth in earnings before tax, but soon after listing, competition intensified, leading to a significant decline in growth, which currently stands at 4%. Concerned about limited future growth opportunities, the board has decided to adopt a market development strategy for growth by acquiring companies in less competitive regions using KP’s significant cash reserves. The board has identified Temidayo Engineering (TE) as a potential acquisition target.

Temidayo Engineering (TE):

TE is a private engineering company established eight years ago, with early accumulated losses that have now turned profitable, achieving an 8% annual growth in earnings before tax. Cash reserves remain low, and capital access has been a constraint on TE’s investment potential. The founders and their families own 70% of the shares, while a venture capitalist holds the remaining 30%.

Acquisition Information:

KP’s board prefers that TE’s founders remain as directors post-acquisition and has sufficient cash reserves to purchase TE outright. A cash offer of ₦13.10 per share is considered likely to encourage TE’s shareholders to approve the acquisition. Alternatively, KP’s board is exploring a share-for-share exchange to preserve cash for future acquisitions and dividends. Recent mergers in the industry have attracted a 25-30% acquisition premium, with TE’s shareholders expecting a premium towards the higher end for a share-for-share offer. KP has asked you to design a share-for-share offer scheme with a 30% premium.

Extracts from the Latest Financial Statements:

Additional Financial Information:

  • KP has ₦0.50 ordinary shares totaling ₦7,500 million, with each share trading at ₦5.28. It is expected that KP’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio will increase by 10% if the acquisition proceeds.
  • TE upgraded its main manufacturing facility last year, expecting annual pre-tax cost savings of ₦50 million from the current financial year. TE has ₦0.25 ordinary shares totaling ₦700 million. TE’s P/E ratio is estimated to be 20% higher than KP’s current P/E ratio based on comparable company analysis.
  • KP’s CEO estimates annual pre-tax revenue and cost synergies of ₦304 million post-acquisition, while the finance director anticipates additional pre-tax financial synergies of ₦106 million, though cautiously, following reports that many acquisitions overestimate synergies. The tax rate is 20%.

Required:

a. Discuss possible sources of financial synergy arising from KP’s acquisition of TE. (6 Marks)

b. Advise the directors on a suitable share-for-share exchange offer that meets TE’s shareholders’ criteria and calculate the impact of both cash and share-for-share offers on the post-acquisition wealth of KP’s and TE’s shareholders. (14 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q2 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Evaluates the acquisition impact of Yekin plc by Peter John plc, focusing on P/E ratio, EPS, market value, and strategic implications of a hostile takeover versus organic growth.

Peter John plc (PJP) is considering a takeover bid for Yekin plc (YP).

PJP’s board of directors has issued the following statement:
“Our superior P/E ratio and synergistic effects of the acquisition will lead to a post-acquisition increase in earnings per share and in the combined market value of the companies.”

Summarized financial data for the companies (N Million):

PJP YP
Sales 480.0 353.0
Profit before tax 63.0 41.0
Tax (18.9) (12.3)
Profit after tax 44.1 28.7
Dividends 20.0 11.0
Non-current assets (net) 284.0 265.0
Current assets 226.4 173.0
Total assets 510.4 438.0

Equity and Liabilities:

PJP YP
Ordinary shares (10 kobo par value) 40.0 30.0
Reserves 211.2 192.0
Medium and long-term borrowing 86.0 114.0
Current liabilities 173.2 102.0
Total 510.4 438.0

Notes:

  1. After-tax savings in cash operating costs of N7,500,000 per year indefinitely are expected as a result of the acquisition.
  2. Initial redundancy costs will be ₦10 million before tax.
  3. PJP’s cost of capital is 12%.
  4. Current share prices: PJP = N29, YP = N18.
  5. The proposed terms of the takeover are payment of 2 PJP shares for every 3 YP shares.

Required:

a. Calculate the current P/E ratios of PJP and YP. (2 Marks)
b. Estimate the expected post-acquisition earnings per share and comment upon the importance of increasing the earnings per share. (4 Marks)
c. Estimate the effect on the combined market value as a result of the takeover using:
i. P/E-based valuation
ii. Cash flow-based valuation
State clearly any assumptions that you make. (5 Marks)
d. Discuss the limitations of your estimates in (c) above. (3 Marks)
e. Evaluate the strategic implications of making a hostile bid for a company compared with an aggressive investment program of organic growth. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2016 – L3 – Q4 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Estimating the additional equity value created by combining two companies and analyzing the impact of premium increases on shareholders.

Eko Product Plc (EP Plc) is a producer of a variety of vegetable oil and other household products in Lagos. The company presently faces significant competition in the market for one of its major raw materials – palm oil. To secure a regular flow of the raw material, the Directors of EP Plc are now considering making an offer for the entire share capital of Benin Oil Plc (BO Plc), a palm oil producing company in Benin.

The following financial information is provided for the two companies:

Parameter EP Plc BO Plc
Equity beta 1.2 1.2
Asset beta 0.9 1.2
Number of shares (million) 210 200
Current share price N29 N12

It is thought that combining the two companies will result in several benefits. It is estimated that combining the two companies will generate free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) of N1,080 million in current value terms, but these will increase by an annual growth rate of 5% for the next four years before reverting to an annual growth rate of 2.25% in perpetuity. In addition to this, combining the companies will result in cash synergy benefits of N100 million per year for the next four years. These synergy benefits are not subject to any inflationary increase, and no synergy benefits will occur after the fourth year.

The debt-to-equity ratio of the combined company will be 40:60 in market value terms and it is expected that the combined company’s cost of debt will be 4.55% before tax.

The income tax rate is 20%, the current risk-free rate of return is 2%, and the market risk premium is 7%. It can be assumed that the combined company’s asset beta is the weighted average of EP Plc’s and BO Plc’s asset betas weighted by their current market values.

EP Plc has offered to acquire BO Plc through a mixed offer of one of its shares for two BO Plc shares, plus a cash payment, such that a 30% premium is paid for the acquisition. Shareholders of BO Plc feel that a 50% premium would be more acceptable. EP Plc has sufficient cash reserves if the premium is 30%, but not if it is 50%.

You are required to:

(a) Estimate the additional equity value created by combining EP Plc and BO Plc based on the free cash flow to firm method. Comment on the results obtained and discuss briefly the assumptions made. (11 Marks)

(b) Estimate the impact on EP Plc’s equity holders if the premium paid is increased to 50% from 30%. (5 Marks)

c. Estimate the additional funds required if a premium of 50% is paid instead of 30% and discuss how this premium could be financed. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – SC – Q7 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Advise on the benefits, drawbacks, alternatives, and target selection criteria for expansion through mergers or acquisitions.

One of the means by which companies expand is through mergers and acquisitions. However, there are other means of expansion aside from these methods.

Inkline Plc. is one of your client companies intending to expand its business by means of merger or acquisition. Your firm of management consultants has been asked to advise the management of the company on what steps to take while considering the merger and acquisition methods, and whether it should go ahead with the expansion programme or otherwise.

Required:

a. (i) FOUR benefits derivable from its proposed means of expansion. (4 Marks)
(ii) THREE probable demerits of employing its proposed method of expansion. (3 Marks)

b. TWO alternatives to merger and acquisition in your report. (2 Marks)

c. Where the company decides to go ahead with either of these methods, indicate THREE criteria the company may consider in choosing its target company. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2019 – L3 – Q1 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Evaluate the synergy expected from a proposed merger between Pako Plc. and RT Plc. using free cash flow analysis, and discuss limitations and alternatives.

Pako Plc. will soon announce a take-over bid for Ronke Tina (RT) Plc., a company in the same industry. The initial bid will be an all-share bid of four Pako shares for every five RT Plc. shares. The most recent annual data relating to the two companies are shown below:

The take-over is expected to result in cost saving in advertising and distribution, reducing the operating costs (including depreciation) of Pako from 76% of sales to 70% of sales. The growth rate of the combined company is expected to be 6% per year for four years and 5% per year thereafter. RT’s debt obligations will be taken over by Pako. The corporate tax rate is expected to remain at 30%.

Sales and costs relevant to the decision may be assumed to be in cash terms.

Required:

a. Estimate how much synergy is expected to be created from the take-over, using free cash flow to the firm analysis for each individual company and the potential combined company. State clearly any assumptions that you make.
Note: The weighted average cost of capital of the combined company is assumed to be 9%. (20 Marks)

b. Discuss any five limitations of the above estimates. (5 Marks)

c. Explain, generally, three advantages and two disadvantages of expansion through merger and acquisition rather than through organic growth. (5 Marks)
(Total: 30 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2014 – L3 – SB – Q3 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Appraise Syntax Plc.'s proposed acquisition of Synapse Chemical Company based on forecast profits and provide a recommendation.

Syntax Plc., a fertilizer company, is concerned about fluctuating sales and earnings. This caused the management of the company to consider acquisition of another company in the same line of business.

In order to boost its sales and stabilize its earnings, Syntax Plc.’s management has identified Synapse Chemical Company Plc. as a possible target. Syntax proposed to acquire Synapse for a consideration of N20 million, which was agreed to by both companies.

Synapse’s expected future profits, as projected from its past financial records, are as follows:

Forecast Profits

Year Revenue (N’m) Cost of Sales (N’m) Other Expenses (N’m) Depreciation (N’m) Total Expenses (N’m) Profit Before Tax (N’m)
2015 60 30 15 5 50 10
2016 70 35 15 4 54 16
2017 78 39 15 4 58 20
2018 86 43 15 4 62 24
2019 94 47 15 4 66 28

The following information is relevant:

  1. The forecast profits have been limited to five years.
  2. All sales are for cash.
  3. The net book value of Synapse’s assets of N2 million is intended to be sold for N1 million in 2015. The expected loss from the disposal of these assets has been included in the depreciation for 2015. These assets currently have a tax written down value of N3 million. Capital allowances were claimed as at when due.
  4. Synapse currently has a tax liability of N4.5 million due for payment in 2015.
  5. The interest charges of N1 million of Synapse Plc. have been included in other expenses.
  6. In order to maintain the future earnings forecast of Synapse Chemical Company, Syntax Plc. needs to invest in capital expenditure.

7. Company income tax is currently at 30 percent, and the tax delay is one year.

8. The after-tax weighted average cost of capital has been calculated at 22%.

The management of Syntax Plc. has asked you, as a Financial Expert, to appraise the intended acquisition of Synapse Chemical Company Plc. and advise on the reasonableness of the acquisition. Your advice should be in the form of a report to the Board of Directors of Syntax Plc.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2021 – L3 – Q5 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Evaluate takeover bids from shareholder perspectives, assess failure to achieve synergies, and suggest risk minimisation steps.

Ponk Plc is a market research company. It has seen significant growth in recent years and obtained a stock market listing 5 years ago. Due to current economic and political turmoil in the country, there has been a significant drop in revenue and profit.

Ponk Plc is planning a takeover bid for XY, a rival market research company specialising in the telecommunication industry – an industry that has been very resistant to the current economic turbulence in the country. XY has an advanced information technology and information system which was developed in-house and which Ponk Plc would acquire the rights to use. Ponk Plc plans to adopt XY’s information technology and information system following the acquisition, and this is expected to be a major contributor to the overall estimated synergistic benefits of the acquisition. These benefits are believed to be worth ₦8 million (in cash flow) at the end of the first year of acquisition and growing annually at 5%.

Ponk Plc has 30 million shares in issue and a current share price of ₦69 before any public announcement of the planned takeover.
XY has 5 million shares in issue and a current share price of ₦128.40.
It is believed that the WACC of the combined company will be 15% p.a.

The directors of Ponk are considering 2 alternative bid offers:

  • Bid offer 1 – Share-based bid of 2 Ponk Plc shares for each of XY share.
  • Bid offer 2 – Cash offer of ₦135 per XY share.

Required:

a. Assuming synergistic benefits are realised, evaluate bid offer 1 and bid offer 2 from the viewpoint of:
(i) Ponk’s existing shareholders
(ii) XY’s shareholders. (6 Marks available for calculations)

b. Advise the directors of Ponk Plc on:
(i) The potential impact on the shareholders of both Ponk and XY of not successfully realising the potential synergistic benefits after the takeover. (6 Marks)
(Up to 4 marks are available for calculations)

(ii) The steps that could be taken to minimise the risk of failing to realise the potential synergistic benefits arising from the adoption of XY’s information technology and information system. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2023 – L3 – Q7 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Evaluate the share price of Obong plc under different growth scenarios and advise on the takeover bid. Explain EMH and its implications for the market.

Obong plc recently received a takeover bid from Abdul plc. If the bid for Obong plc is successful, it will provide Abdul plc the needed competitive edge in research and development to expand its laboratories into the production of the COVID-19 vaccine.

The shareholders of Obong plc will only accept an offer that meets a required return of 14% on their current shareholdings.

Obong plc recently paid a dividend of N20, and this is expected to grow at a rate of 7% for the foreseeable future.

Required:

a. Estimate the share price of Obong plc today. (2 Marks)

b. If Obong plc accepts the bid from Abdul plc, it is estimated that the new growth rate will rise to 12% for the first 3 years and thereafter stabilize at 7%. Calculate the new share price to the shareholders of Obong plc. (2 Marks)

c. As a financial advisor, recommend to the shareholders of Obong plc whether the offer from Abdul plc should be accepted. (2 Marks)

d. According to Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), it is believed that the market would react instantly and accurately to the merger announcement between Obong plc and Abdul plc.
Define briefly the THREE forms of EMH and their implications to the market. (9 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – May 2023 – L3 – Q1b – Mergers and Acquisitions

Discuss the typical factors included in takeover regulations across countries.

b. The regulation of takeovers varies from country to country.

Outline the typical factors that such a regulation includes. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q7 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Advise Inkline Plc on expansion through mergers or acquisitions, potential benefits, demerits, alternatives, and target criteria.

One of the means by which companies expand is through mergers and acquisitions. However, there are other means of expansion aside from these methods.

Inkline Plc, one of your client companies, is intending to expand its business by means of a merger or acquisition. Your firm of management consultants has been asked to advise the management of the company on what steps to take while considering the merger and acquisition methods and whether it should go ahead with the expansion program or otherwise.

Required:

(a) Advise your client on:
(i) Four benefits derivable from its proposed means of expansion. (4 Marks)
(ii) Three probable demerits of employing its proposed method of expansion. (3 Marks)

(b) State two alternatives to merger and acquisition in your report. (2 Marks)

(c) Where the company decides to go ahead with either of these methods, indicate three criteria the company may consider in choosing its target company. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Advise on financial synergies from KP's acquisition of TE and evaluate cash vs. share-for-share offers.

You run a financial consultancy firm and have been approached by a new client for advice on a potential acquisition. Kola Plc (KP) is a large engineering company that was listed on the stock market ten years ago, with the founders retaining a 20% stake in the business. KP initially experienced rapid growth in earnings before tax, but soon after listing, competition intensified, leading to a significant decline in growth, which currently stands at 4%. Concerned about limited future growth opportunities, the board has decided to adopt a market development strategy for growth by acquiring companies in less competitive regions using KP’s significant cash reserves. The board has identified Temidayo Engineering (TE) as a potential acquisition target.

Temidayo Engineering (TE):

TE is a private engineering company established eight years ago, with early accumulated losses that have now turned profitable, achieving an 8% annual growth in earnings before tax. Cash reserves remain low, and capital access has been a constraint on TE’s investment potential. The founders and their families own 70% of the shares, while a venture capitalist holds the remaining 30%.

Acquisition Information:

KP’s board prefers that TE’s founders remain as directors post-acquisition and has sufficient cash reserves to purchase TE outright. A cash offer of ₦13.10 per share is considered likely to encourage TE’s shareholders to approve the acquisition. Alternatively, KP’s board is exploring a share-for-share exchange to preserve cash for future acquisitions and dividends. Recent mergers in the industry have attracted a 25-30% acquisition premium, with TE’s shareholders expecting a premium towards the higher end for a share-for-share offer. KP has asked you to design a share-for-share offer scheme with a 30% premium.

Extracts from the Latest Financial Statements:

Additional Financial Information:

  • KP has ₦0.50 ordinary shares totaling ₦7,500 million, with each share trading at ₦5.28. It is expected that KP’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio will increase by 10% if the acquisition proceeds.
  • TE upgraded its main manufacturing facility last year, expecting annual pre-tax cost savings of ₦50 million from the current financial year. TE has ₦0.25 ordinary shares totaling ₦700 million. TE’s P/E ratio is estimated to be 20% higher than KP’s current P/E ratio based on comparable company analysis.
  • KP’s CEO estimates annual pre-tax revenue and cost synergies of ₦304 million post-acquisition, while the finance director anticipates additional pre-tax financial synergies of ₦106 million, though cautiously, following reports that many acquisitions overestimate synergies. The tax rate is 20%.

Required:

a. Discuss possible sources of financial synergy arising from KP’s acquisition of TE. (6 Marks)

b. Advise the directors on a suitable share-for-share exchange offer that meets TE’s shareholders’ criteria and calculate the impact of both cash and share-for-share offers on the post-acquisition wealth of KP’s and TE’s shareholders. (14 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q2 – Mergers and Acquisitions

Evaluates the acquisition impact of Yekin plc by Peter John plc, focusing on P/E ratio, EPS, market value, and strategic implications of a hostile takeover versus organic growth.

Peter John plc (PJP) is considering a takeover bid for Yekin plc (YP).

PJP’s board of directors has issued the following statement:
“Our superior P/E ratio and synergistic effects of the acquisition will lead to a post-acquisition increase in earnings per share and in the combined market value of the companies.”

Summarized financial data for the companies (N Million):

PJP YP
Sales 480.0 353.0
Profit before tax 63.0 41.0
Tax (18.9) (12.3)
Profit after tax 44.1 28.7
Dividends 20.0 11.0
Non-current assets (net) 284.0 265.0
Current assets 226.4 173.0
Total assets 510.4 438.0

Equity and Liabilities:

PJP YP
Ordinary shares (10 kobo par value) 40.0 30.0
Reserves 211.2 192.0
Medium and long-term borrowing 86.0 114.0
Current liabilities 173.2 102.0
Total 510.4 438.0

Notes:

  1. After-tax savings in cash operating costs of N7,500,000 per year indefinitely are expected as a result of the acquisition.
  2. Initial redundancy costs will be ₦10 million before tax.
  3. PJP’s cost of capital is 12%.
  4. Current share prices: PJP = N29, YP = N18.
  5. The proposed terms of the takeover are payment of 2 PJP shares for every 3 YP shares.

Required:

a. Calculate the current P/E ratios of PJP and YP. (2 Marks)
b. Estimate the expected post-acquisition earnings per share and comment upon the importance of increasing the earnings per share. (4 Marks)
c. Estimate the effect on the combined market value as a result of the takeover using:
i. P/E-based valuation
ii. Cash flow-based valuation
State clearly any assumptions that you make. (5 Marks)
d. Discuss the limitations of your estimates in (c) above. (3 Marks)
e. Evaluate the strategic implications of making a hostile bid for a company compared with an aggressive investment program of organic growth. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.