Question Tag: Sales quantity

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

PM – May 2019 – L2 – Q1 – Standard Costing and Variance Analysis

Analyze variances, reconcile budgeted and actual profit, and evaluate pricing strategy success for KK Plc.

KK Plc. buys small tablet computers which it customizes for the Nigerian market and then resells to electronics retailers. Although a detailed variance analysis is carried out each month, the CEO John, T, has become concerned that no one has a clear responsibility for taking action in response to this analysis or for using it to carry out an ex-post analysis of the outcome of important decisions.

The following is an extract from last month’s budget:

Model A B C
Selling price/unit (N) 1,000 1,250 1,500
Variable cost/unit (N) 400 500 600
Sales (units) 25,000 40,000 15,000

The budgeted fixed costs were N12,500,000 for the month, which were not dependent on the mix or quantities of products sold. When the budget was being prepared, it was estimated that the total size of the market (including sales by the company and the competitors) would be 400,000 units.

Shortly after the beginning of the month, the marketing director, Okon Nelson, decided that a change of pricing strategy was necessary in response to the recessionary economic conditions. The price of Model A was reduced by 10%, and the prices of Models B and C were each reduced by 20%. The company was partly successful in passing on the impact of these price reductions to its suppliers, and as a consequence, the variable cost per unit for all three models was reduced by 5%. Actual fixed costs were 5% higher than budgeted because of the marketing costs associated with publishing the price reductions.

As a result of the recessionary conditions, the actual total market size was just 200,000 units. The actual quantities sold by the company were as follows:

Actual quantities sold by the company were as follows:

Model Sales (units)
A 14,800
B 29,500
C 11,700

Required:
a. Present a comprehensive analysis of variances, reconciling the budgeted and actual profit for last month in as much detail as possible from the information provided. (25 Marks)
b. Evaluate the financial success (or otherwise) of the decision to change the pricing strategy and assess whether the difference between the budgeted and actual performance was attributable mainly to luck or to factors within the company’s control. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "PM – May 2019 – L2 – Q1 – Standard Costing and Variance Analysis"

PM – May 2019 – L2 – Q1 – Standard Costing and Variance Analysis

Analyze variances, reconcile budgeted and actual profit, and evaluate pricing strategy success for KK Plc.

KK Plc. buys small tablet computers which it customizes for the Nigerian market and then resells to electronics retailers. Although a detailed variance analysis is carried out each month, the CEO John, T, has become concerned that no one has a clear responsibility for taking action in response to this analysis or for using it to carry out an ex-post analysis of the outcome of important decisions.

The following is an extract from last month’s budget:

Model A B C
Selling price/unit (N) 1,000 1,250 1,500
Variable cost/unit (N) 400 500 600
Sales (units) 25,000 40,000 15,000

The budgeted fixed costs were N12,500,000 for the month, which were not dependent on the mix or quantities of products sold. When the budget was being prepared, it was estimated that the total size of the market (including sales by the company and the competitors) would be 400,000 units.

Shortly after the beginning of the month, the marketing director, Okon Nelson, decided that a change of pricing strategy was necessary in response to the recessionary economic conditions. The price of Model A was reduced by 10%, and the prices of Models B and C were each reduced by 20%. The company was partly successful in passing on the impact of these price reductions to its suppliers, and as a consequence, the variable cost per unit for all three models was reduced by 5%. Actual fixed costs were 5% higher than budgeted because of the marketing costs associated with publishing the price reductions.

As a result of the recessionary conditions, the actual total market size was just 200,000 units. The actual quantities sold by the company were as follows:

Actual quantities sold by the company were as follows:

Model Sales (units)
A 14,800
B 29,500
C 11,700

Required:
a. Present a comprehensive analysis of variances, reconciling the budgeted and actual profit for last month in as much detail as possible from the information provided. (25 Marks)
b. Evaluate the financial success (or otherwise) of the decision to change the pricing strategy and assess whether the difference between the budgeted and actual performance was attributable mainly to luck or to factors within the company’s control. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "PM – May 2019 – L2 – Q1 – Standard Costing and Variance Analysis"

error: Content is protected !!
Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan