- 20 Marks
CR – Nov 2016 – L1 – SB – Q4 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)
Discuss fair value principles, principal market, and valuation adjustments under IFRS 13.
Question
a. Prior to the advent of IFRS 13, many standards such as IAS 16, IAS 38, IAS 40, and IAS 39 among others required the use of fair value. These various requirements have been harmonized with the introduction of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.
Required:
Define fair value in accordance with IFRS 13. (2 Marks)
b. One of the companies formerly operating in Nigeria that had recently relocated its operation to Ghana as a result of the challenging business environment in Nigeria has access to both Lagos and Accra markets for its product. The product sells at slightly different prices (in naira) in the two active markets. An entity enters into transactions in both markets and can access the price in those markets for the product at the measurement date as follows:
Market | Lagos (N’000) | Accra (N’000) |
---|---|---|
Sale Price | 260 | 250 |
Transaction Cost | (30) | (10) |
Transport Cost | (20) | (20) |
Net Price | 210 | 220 |
Required:
i. Briefly explain the principal market of an asset in accordance with IFRS 13 and determine what fair value would be used to measure the sale of the above product if the Lagos market were the principal market. (4 Marks)
ii. How is fair value determined in the absence of a principal market and what fair value would be used to measure the sale of the above product if no principal market could be identified? (4 Marks)
c. Megida Plc, a public limited liability company, has just acquired some hectares of land in Abuja earmarked by the government for economic empowerment programs. The land is expected to be used for commercial purposes. The fair value of the land if used for commercial purposes is N100 million, which includes tax credits.
Market participants consider alternative use for residential purposes, with an estimated fair value of N148 million, adjusted for:
- Legal Costs: N4 million
- Viability Analysis Costs: N6 million
- Demolition Costs: N2 million
- Planning Permission Uncertainty: 20% risk discount.
Required:
Discuss how Megida Plc should compute the fair value of the Abuja land with reference to IFRS 13 principles. (10 Marks)
Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.
- Tags: Fair Value, IFRS 13, Measurement Methods, Non-Financial Assets, Principal Market
- Level: Level 3
- Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)
- Series: NOV 2016