Question Tag: Maintenance Costs

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

FM – Nov 2018 – L3 – Q5 – Capital Budgeting under Uncertainty

Analyze whether replacing a machine after three or four years is more beneficial based on economic costs and tax implications.

Kuku Plc. had a need for a machine. After four years of purchase, the machine will no longer be capable of efficient working at the level of use by the company. The company typically replaces machines every four years. The production manager has noted that in the fourth year, the machine will require additional maintenance to maintain normal efficiency. This raises the question of whether the machine should be replaced after three years instead of four years, as per company practice.

Relevant information is as follows:

(i) A new machine will cost N240,000. If retained for four years, it will have zero scrap value at the end. If retained for three years, it will have an estimated disposal value of N30,000. The machine qualifies for capital allowance of 20% on a reducing balance basis each year, except in the last year. In the final year, if the disposal proceeds are less than the tax written-down value, the difference will be an additional tax relief.

The machine is assumed to be bought and disposed of on the last day of the company’s accounting year.

(ii) The company tax rate is 30%, payable on the last day of the relevant accounting year.

(iii) Maintenance costs are covered by the supplier in the first year. In the second and third years, maintenance costs average N30,000 annually. In the fourth year, they increase to N60,000. Maintenance costs are tax-allowable and payable on the first day of the accounting year.

(iv) The company’s cost of capital is 15%.

Required:

a. Prepare calculations to determine whether it is economically beneficial to replace the machine after three years or four years. (12 Marks)

b. Discuss two additional factors that could influence the company’s replacement decision, including any potential weaknesses in the decision criteria. (3 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "FM – Nov 2018 – L3 – Q5 – Capital Budgeting under Uncertainty"

MA – Nov 2020 – L2 – Q5 – High/Low Analysis, Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis

Determine maintenance costs using the high-low method, and calculate break-even point, required sales for target profit, and margin of safety for Quickspray Ltd.

Quickspray Ltd offers professional car spraying services at Suame Magazine. The company is planning its activities for the month of June 2018 for its saloon car spraying section. The company charges a service fee of GH¢1,000 and incurs fixed cost (excluding fixed maintenance cost) and variable cost per unit (excluding variable maintenance cost) of GH¢35,000 and GH¢644.39 respectively for spraying a saloon car.

The following data also relates to Quickspray Ltd on the maintenance hours of its key machine, revenue, and profit for the six months ended April 2018:

Month Maintenance Hours Revenue (GH¢) Profit (GH¢)
November 2017 1,200 19,000 700
December 2017 1,425 24,000 1,425
January 2018 1,410 20,100 650
February 2018 1,400 20,000 1,000
March 2018 1,175 18,000 (125)
April 2018 1,275 19,000 175

Total fixed cost increases by GH¢1,120 when maintenance hours go beyond 1,400.

Required:

a) Determine the total maintenance cost of production, using the high-low method if:

i) Maintenance hours for May are budgeted to be 1,520.
ii) Maintenance hours for June are budgeted to be 1,075.

b) Calculate for the month of May the:

i) Break-even point in units and value.
ii) Sales level required to make an after-tax profit of GH¢21,150, assuming Quickspray Ltd is in the 25% tax bracket.
iii) Margin of safety if the target after-tax profit of GH¢21,150 is achieved.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Nov 2020 – L2 – Q5 – High/Low Analysis, Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis"

FM – Nov 2018 – L3 – Q5 – Capital Budgeting under Uncertainty

Analyze whether replacing a machine after three or four years is more beneficial based on economic costs and tax implications.

Kuku Plc. had a need for a machine. After four years of purchase, the machine will no longer be capable of efficient working at the level of use by the company. The company typically replaces machines every four years. The production manager has noted that in the fourth year, the machine will require additional maintenance to maintain normal efficiency. This raises the question of whether the machine should be replaced after three years instead of four years, as per company practice.

Relevant information is as follows:

(i) A new machine will cost N240,000. If retained for four years, it will have zero scrap value at the end. If retained for three years, it will have an estimated disposal value of N30,000. The machine qualifies for capital allowance of 20% on a reducing balance basis each year, except in the last year. In the final year, if the disposal proceeds are less than the tax written-down value, the difference will be an additional tax relief.

The machine is assumed to be bought and disposed of on the last day of the company’s accounting year.

(ii) The company tax rate is 30%, payable on the last day of the relevant accounting year.

(iii) Maintenance costs are covered by the supplier in the first year. In the second and third years, maintenance costs average N30,000 annually. In the fourth year, they increase to N60,000. Maintenance costs are tax-allowable and payable on the first day of the accounting year.

(iv) The company’s cost of capital is 15%.

Required:

a. Prepare calculations to determine whether it is economically beneficial to replace the machine after three years or four years. (12 Marks)

b. Discuss two additional factors that could influence the company’s replacement decision, including any potential weaknesses in the decision criteria. (3 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "FM – Nov 2018 – L3 – Q5 – Capital Budgeting under Uncertainty"

MA – Nov 2020 – L2 – Q5 – High/Low Analysis, Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis

Determine maintenance costs using the high-low method, and calculate break-even point, required sales for target profit, and margin of safety for Quickspray Ltd.

Quickspray Ltd offers professional car spraying services at Suame Magazine. The company is planning its activities for the month of June 2018 for its saloon car spraying section. The company charges a service fee of GH¢1,000 and incurs fixed cost (excluding fixed maintenance cost) and variable cost per unit (excluding variable maintenance cost) of GH¢35,000 and GH¢644.39 respectively for spraying a saloon car.

The following data also relates to Quickspray Ltd on the maintenance hours of its key machine, revenue, and profit for the six months ended April 2018:

Month Maintenance Hours Revenue (GH¢) Profit (GH¢)
November 2017 1,200 19,000 700
December 2017 1,425 24,000 1,425
January 2018 1,410 20,100 650
February 2018 1,400 20,000 1,000
March 2018 1,175 18,000 (125)
April 2018 1,275 19,000 175

Total fixed cost increases by GH¢1,120 when maintenance hours go beyond 1,400.

Required:

a) Determine the total maintenance cost of production, using the high-low method if:

i) Maintenance hours for May are budgeted to be 1,520.
ii) Maintenance hours for June are budgeted to be 1,075.

b) Calculate for the month of May the:

i) Break-even point in units and value.
ii) Sales level required to make an after-tax profit of GH¢21,150, assuming Quickspray Ltd is in the 25% tax bracket.
iii) Margin of safety if the target after-tax profit of GH¢21,150 is achieved.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Nov 2020 – L2 – Q5 – High/Low Analysis, Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis"

error: Content is protected !!
Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan