Question Tag: Legal claims

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

AAA – Nov 2013 – L3 – A – Q15 – Audit Reporting

This question assesses the primary purpose of sending a letter of enquiry to a legal firm regarding client litigation.

The main reasons why auditors send a letter of enquiry to the legal firm handling litigation or claims on behalf of their client is to provide:
A. Auditors with weak position in client litigation and claims
B. Auditors with written submission and statement of claims to the court
C. Information concerning the progress of outstanding cases to date
D. Auditors with corroborative audit evidence
E. Auditors with impact of legal opinion on financial statements

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2013 – L3 – A – Q15 – Audit Reporting"

AAA – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q5 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy

Identification of financial statement risks in planning the final audit for Maideline Nigeria Limited’s winding-up.

Maideline Nigeria Limited manufactures tyres for use by cars, trucks, and trailers. The company is owner-managed, meaning the shareholders are also the directors. On June 1, 2020, the directors decided to wind up the company due to the high cost of operations, the Naira’s depreciation against the US dollar, and the economic impact of COVID-19, which have severely impacted the company’s ability to continue business.

Management notified employees, suppliers, and customers that Maideline would cease all manufacturing activities by September 30. Consequently, all factory workers and most employees in accounts and administration were terminated effective September 30. Remaining employees will face redundancy by November 30. A minimal head office team, including the Company Secretary and some support staff, will remain operational for a few more years until the company winds down completely.

Maideline operated 20 branches and a head office. Of these, 12 branches are located in company-owned buildings, while the remaining 8 operate from leased buildings with lease terms of three to five years. Lease agreements prohibit sub-letting and sale. On adopting IFRS 16, the entity assumed lease renewals at term end, recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets. A small head office building will remain in use until its lease expires in three years. Maideline accounts for its tangible non-current assets at cost, less depreciation, and has recognized deferred tax assets due to past tax losses and unutilized capital allowances.

All products sold carry a one-year warranty. Until May 31, 2020, the company offered two- and three-year extended warranties, but these were discontinued from March 1, 2020. Maideline distributes products nationally and internationally under three-year agreements and maintains annual supplier contracts. While no distributors or suppliers have pursued legal actions, some are withholding payments, awaiting penalty settlements they claim are due.

Required:
Using the information provided, identify and explain the financial statement risks to be taken into account in planning the final audit of Maideline in respect of the year ended December 31, 2020. (20 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q5 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy"

CR – Nov 2017 – L3 – Q6 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)

Provide advice on provisions and disclosures for Eko Exports Limited’s financial statements based on events in 2016.

The following information pertains to Eko Exports Limited (EEL) for the financial year ended December 31, 2016:

  1. A customer who owed ₦1 million was declared bankrupt after his warehouse was destroyed by fire on February 10, 2017. It is expected that the customer would be able to recover 50% of the loss from the insurance company.
  2. An employee of EEL forged the signatures of directors and made cash withdrawals of ₦7.5 million from the bank. Of these, ₦1.5 million were withdrawn before December 31, 2016. Investigations revealed that an employee of the bank was also involved, and under a settlement arrangement, the bank paid 60% of the amount to EEL on January 27, 2017.
  3. EEL has filed a claim against one of its vendors for supplying defective goods. EEL’s legal consultant is confident that damages of ₦1 million would be paid to EEL. The supplier has already reimbursed the actual cost of the defective goods.
  4. A suit for infringement of patents, seeking damages of ₦2 million, was filed by a third party. EEL’s legal consultant is of the opinion that an unfavorable outcome is most likely. Based on past experience, he has advised that there is a 60% probability that the amount of damages would be ₦1 million and a 40% likelihood that the amount would be ₦1.5 million.

Required:
Advise EEL about the amount of provision that should be incorporated and the disclosures that are required to be made in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Total: 15 Marks

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2017 – L3 – Q6 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)"

AA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q4a – Completion Procedures and Reporting

Explain the auditor's responsibilities regarding subsequent events and how a legal claim should be reported in financial statements.

You are an audit assistant for an audit client with a year-end of 31 December 2021. A major customer has instituted a legal action against the company for faulty goods supplied after the year-end. A recently recruited intern who was part of your team was of the opinion that because of the cut-off assertion, any event after 31 December 2021 should not affect the financial statements and therefore the auditor should have no responsibility for issues occurring after the reporting year.

Following your audit of the client, you have concluded that there is a possibility, but not a probability, that the claim will be successful. However, management has decided not to make a provision or disclosure in the financial statements for this matter.

Required:
In reference to the preamble:
i) Describe the auditor’s responsibility for subsequent events occurring between:

  • The year-end date and the date the auditor’s report is signed; and
  • The date the auditor’s report is signed and the date the financial statements are issued. (6 marks)

ii) Explain how the matter should be reported in the financial statements. (4 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q4a – Completion Procedures and Reporting"

AA – May 2017 – L2 – Q4b – Audit and Assurance Evidence

Explanation of a contingent liability and audit procedures for its verification.

At a meeting to discuss the draft accounts with senior management of Good Old Days Ltd, the external auditors, Gelian Chartered Accountants, asked management to confirm the amount of contingent liability of GH¢100 million in respect of a pending legal suit against the company. The CEO quizzed the chief accountant to explain how the amount of GH¢100 million was arrived at.

Required:
i) Describe briefly what a contingent liability is, giving examples where appropriate. (2 marks)
ii) Explain in detail the audit procedures for the verification of contingent liabilities. (5 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2017 – L2 – Q4b – Audit and Assurance Evidence"

AA – May 2018 – L2 – Q4a – Audit and Assurance Evidence

Describes substantive audit procedures for depreciation of assets and a legal claim involving food poisoning.

BDE Company Limited operates a hotel providing accommodation, leisure facilities, and restaurants. Its year-end is 31 March. You are the senior associate of ABC and Associates and are currently preparing the audit programmes for the year-end audit of BDE Company Limited. You are reviewing the notes of last week’s meeting between the audit manager and finance director, where two material issues were discussed.

Depreciation
BDE Company Limited incurred significant capital expenditure during the year for refurbishing the restaurant facilities for the hotel. The finance director has proposed that the new leisure equipment should be depreciated over 10 years using the straight-line method.

Food Poisoning
BDE’s directors received correspondence in January from a group of customers who attended a wedding at the hotel. They have alleged that they suffered severe food poisoning from food eaten at the hotel and are claiming substantial damages. BDE’s lawyers have received the claim and believe that the lawsuit against the company is unlikely to be successful.

Required:
i) Describe substantive procedures to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence in relation to the above two issues. (6 marks)

ii) List and explain the purpose of three items that should be included on every working paper prepared by the audit team during the audit of depreciation and food poisoning of BDE Company Limited. (3 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2018 – L2 – Q4a – Audit and Assurance Evidence"

AAA – Nov 2013 – L3 – A – Q15 – Audit Reporting

This question assesses the primary purpose of sending a letter of enquiry to a legal firm regarding client litigation.

The main reasons why auditors send a letter of enquiry to the legal firm handling litigation or claims on behalf of their client is to provide:
A. Auditors with weak position in client litigation and claims
B. Auditors with written submission and statement of claims to the court
C. Information concerning the progress of outstanding cases to date
D. Auditors with corroborative audit evidence
E. Auditors with impact of legal opinion on financial statements

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2013 – L3 – A – Q15 – Audit Reporting"

AAA – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q5 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy

Identification of financial statement risks in planning the final audit for Maideline Nigeria Limited’s winding-up.

Maideline Nigeria Limited manufactures tyres for use by cars, trucks, and trailers. The company is owner-managed, meaning the shareholders are also the directors. On June 1, 2020, the directors decided to wind up the company due to the high cost of operations, the Naira’s depreciation against the US dollar, and the economic impact of COVID-19, which have severely impacted the company’s ability to continue business.

Management notified employees, suppliers, and customers that Maideline would cease all manufacturing activities by September 30. Consequently, all factory workers and most employees in accounts and administration were terminated effective September 30. Remaining employees will face redundancy by November 30. A minimal head office team, including the Company Secretary and some support staff, will remain operational for a few more years until the company winds down completely.

Maideline operated 20 branches and a head office. Of these, 12 branches are located in company-owned buildings, while the remaining 8 operate from leased buildings with lease terms of three to five years. Lease agreements prohibit sub-letting and sale. On adopting IFRS 16, the entity assumed lease renewals at term end, recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets. A small head office building will remain in use until its lease expires in three years. Maideline accounts for its tangible non-current assets at cost, less depreciation, and has recognized deferred tax assets due to past tax losses and unutilized capital allowances.

All products sold carry a one-year warranty. Until May 31, 2020, the company offered two- and three-year extended warranties, but these were discontinued from March 1, 2020. Maideline distributes products nationally and internationally under three-year agreements and maintains annual supplier contracts. While no distributors or suppliers have pursued legal actions, some are withholding payments, awaiting penalty settlements they claim are due.

Required:
Using the information provided, identify and explain the financial statement risks to be taken into account in planning the final audit of Maideline in respect of the year ended December 31, 2020. (20 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q5 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy"

CR – Nov 2017 – L3 – Q6 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)

Provide advice on provisions and disclosures for Eko Exports Limited’s financial statements based on events in 2016.

The following information pertains to Eko Exports Limited (EEL) for the financial year ended December 31, 2016:

  1. A customer who owed ₦1 million was declared bankrupt after his warehouse was destroyed by fire on February 10, 2017. It is expected that the customer would be able to recover 50% of the loss from the insurance company.
  2. An employee of EEL forged the signatures of directors and made cash withdrawals of ₦7.5 million from the bank. Of these, ₦1.5 million were withdrawn before December 31, 2016. Investigations revealed that an employee of the bank was also involved, and under a settlement arrangement, the bank paid 60% of the amount to EEL on January 27, 2017.
  3. EEL has filed a claim against one of its vendors for supplying defective goods. EEL’s legal consultant is confident that damages of ₦1 million would be paid to EEL. The supplier has already reimbursed the actual cost of the defective goods.
  4. A suit for infringement of patents, seeking damages of ₦2 million, was filed by a third party. EEL’s legal consultant is of the opinion that an unfavorable outcome is most likely. Based on past experience, he has advised that there is a 60% probability that the amount of damages would be ₦1 million and a 40% likelihood that the amount would be ₦1.5 million.

Required:
Advise EEL about the amount of provision that should be incorporated and the disclosures that are required to be made in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Total: 15 Marks

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2017 – L3 – Q6 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)"

AA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q4a – Completion Procedures and Reporting

Explain the auditor's responsibilities regarding subsequent events and how a legal claim should be reported in financial statements.

You are an audit assistant for an audit client with a year-end of 31 December 2021. A major customer has instituted a legal action against the company for faulty goods supplied after the year-end. A recently recruited intern who was part of your team was of the opinion that because of the cut-off assertion, any event after 31 December 2021 should not affect the financial statements and therefore the auditor should have no responsibility for issues occurring after the reporting year.

Following your audit of the client, you have concluded that there is a possibility, but not a probability, that the claim will be successful. However, management has decided not to make a provision or disclosure in the financial statements for this matter.

Required:
In reference to the preamble:
i) Describe the auditor’s responsibility for subsequent events occurring between:

  • The year-end date and the date the auditor’s report is signed; and
  • The date the auditor’s report is signed and the date the financial statements are issued. (6 marks)

ii) Explain how the matter should be reported in the financial statements. (4 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q4a – Completion Procedures and Reporting"

AA – May 2017 – L2 – Q4b – Audit and Assurance Evidence

Explanation of a contingent liability and audit procedures for its verification.

At a meeting to discuss the draft accounts with senior management of Good Old Days Ltd, the external auditors, Gelian Chartered Accountants, asked management to confirm the amount of contingent liability of GH¢100 million in respect of a pending legal suit against the company. The CEO quizzed the chief accountant to explain how the amount of GH¢100 million was arrived at.

Required:
i) Describe briefly what a contingent liability is, giving examples where appropriate. (2 marks)
ii) Explain in detail the audit procedures for the verification of contingent liabilities. (5 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2017 – L2 – Q4b – Audit and Assurance Evidence"

AA – May 2018 – L2 – Q4a – Audit and Assurance Evidence

Describes substantive audit procedures for depreciation of assets and a legal claim involving food poisoning.

BDE Company Limited operates a hotel providing accommodation, leisure facilities, and restaurants. Its year-end is 31 March. You are the senior associate of ABC and Associates and are currently preparing the audit programmes for the year-end audit of BDE Company Limited. You are reviewing the notes of last week’s meeting between the audit manager and finance director, where two material issues were discussed.

Depreciation
BDE Company Limited incurred significant capital expenditure during the year for refurbishing the restaurant facilities for the hotel. The finance director has proposed that the new leisure equipment should be depreciated over 10 years using the straight-line method.

Food Poisoning
BDE’s directors received correspondence in January from a group of customers who attended a wedding at the hotel. They have alleged that they suffered severe food poisoning from food eaten at the hotel and are claiming substantial damages. BDE’s lawyers have received the claim and believe that the lawsuit against the company is unlikely to be successful.

Required:
i) Describe substantive procedures to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence in relation to the above two issues. (6 marks)

ii) List and explain the purpose of three items that should be included on every working paper prepared by the audit team during the audit of depreciation and food poisoning of BDE Company Limited. (3 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2018 – L2 – Q4a – Audit and Assurance Evidence"

error: Content is protected !!
Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan