Question Tag: Defined Benefit Plan

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

AAA – May 2018 – L3 – SA – Q1 – Audit of Complex Entities

Evaluate materiality reassessment, audit findings, and joint audit implications for Honey Group’s financial statements.

You are a manager in Puposola & Company (Chartered Accountants) responsible for the audit of the Honey Group (the Group), a quoted company. The Group’s main activity is steel manufacturing and it comprises of a parent company and three subsidiaries. Your firm currently audits all components of the Group. You are working on the audit of the Group’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2017. This morning, the audit engagement partner left a note for you.

“Hello

I have gone through the draft consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes which summarise the key audit findings and some background information.

Although, at the planning stage, materiality was initially determined to be N900,000, and was calculated based on the assumption that Honey Group is a high-risk client due to its listing status. However, due to a number of issues that arose during the audit, there is a need to revise the materiality level for the financial statements as a whole. The revised level of materiality should now be N700,000.

Thank you.”

The Group’s draft consolidated financial statements, with notes referenced to key audit findings, are shown below:

Draft Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

Note June 30, 2017 Draft (N’000) June 30, 2016 Actual (N’000)
Revenue 98,795 103,100
Cost of sales (75,250) (74,560)
Gross profit 23,545 28,540
Operating expenses (14,900) (17,500)
Operating profit 8,645 11,040
Share of profit of associate 1,010 900
Finance costs (380) (340)
Profit before tax 9,275 11,600
Taxation (3,200) (3,500)
Profit for the year 6,075 8,100
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax:
Gain on property revaluation 800 —–
Actuarial losses on defined benefit plan (1,100) (200)
Other comprehensive loss (300) (200)
Total comprehensive income for the year 5,775 7,900

Notes: Key Audit Findings on Statement of Comprehensive Income

  1. Revenue has been stable for all components of the Group with the exception of one subsidiary, Copesink Company, which witnessed a 25% decrease in revenue.
  2. Operating expenses for the year to June 2017 is shown net of profit on a property disposal of N2 million. Our evidence includes agreeing the cash receipts to the bank statement and sale documentation, and we have confirmed that the property has been removed from the non-current asset register. The audit junior noted when reviewing the sale document that there is an option to repurchase the property in five years’ time, but did not discuss the matter with management.
  3. The property revaluation relates to the Group’s head office. The audit team has not obtained evidence on the revaluation, as the gain was immaterial based on the initial calculation of materiality.
  4. The actuarial loss is attributed to an unexpected stock market crash. The Group’s pension plan is managed by Axial Company, a firm of independent fund managers who maintain the necessary accounting records relating to the plan. Axial Company has supplied written representation as to the value of the defined benefit plan’s assets and liabilities at June 30, 2017. No other audit work has been performed other than to agree the amount reported in the financial statements to supporting documentation supplied by Axial Company.

Draft Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Note June 30, 2017 Draft (N’000) June 30, 2016 Actual (N’000)
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 81,800 76,300
Goodwill 5,350 5,350
Investment in associate 4,230 4,230
Non-current assets held for sale 7,800
Total non-current assets 99,180 85,880
Current assets
Inventory 8,600 8,000
Receivables 8,540 7,800
Cash and cash equivalents 2,100 2,420
Total current assets 19,240 18,220
Total assets 118,420 104,100
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Share capital 12,500 12,500
Revaluation reserve 3,300 2,500
Retained earnings 33,600 29,400
Non-controlling interest 4,350 4,000
Total equity 53,750 48,400
Non-current liabilities
Defined benefit pension plan 10,820 9,250
Long-term borrowings 43,000 35,000
Deferred tax 1,950 1,350
Total non-current liabilities 55,770 45,600
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 6,200 7,300
Provisions 2,700 2,800
Total current liabilities 8,900 10,100
Total liabilities 64,670 55,700
Total equity and liabilities 118,420 104,100

Notes: Key Audit Findings on Statement of Financial Position

  1. The goodwill relates to each of the subsidiaries in the Group. Management has confirmed in writing that goodwill is stated correctly, and our other audit procedure was to arithmetically check the impairment review conducted by management.
  2. The associate is a 30% holding in Jamil Company, purchased to provide investment income. The audit team has not obtained evidence regarding the associate as there is no movement in the amount recognised in the statement of financial position.
  3. The non-current assets held for sale relate to a trading division of one of the subsidiaries, which represents one third of that subsidiary’s net assets. The sale of the division was announced in May 2017, and is expected to be complete by December 31, 2017. Audit evidence obtained includes a review of the sales agreement and confirmation from the buyer obtained in July 2017, that the sale will take place.
  4. Two of the Group’s subsidiaries are partly owned by shareholders external to the Group.
  5. A loan of N8 million was obtained in October 2016 at an interest rate of 2%, payable annually in arrears. The terms of the loan have been confirmed from the loan agreement provided by the bank. There was no repayment of the loan in the books as at prior year end.

Required:

a. Explain why auditors may need to reassess materiality as the audit progresses. (4 Marks)

b. Assess the implications of the key audit findings for the completion of the audit.

Note: Your assessment must consider whether the key audit findings indicate a risk of material misstatement. Where the key audit findings refer to audit evidence, you must also consider the adequacy of the audit evidence obtained, but you do not need to recommend further specific procedures. (18 Marks)

c. Discuss TWO advantages and TWO disadvantages of a joint audit being performed on the financial statements. (8 Marks)

(Total 30 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – May 2018 – L3 – SA – Q1 – Audit of Complex Entities"

CR – Nov 2017 – L3 – Q5 – Employee Benefits (IAS 19)

Explain and distinguish between defined contribution and defined benefit plans, providing IAS 19 accounting treatments for two pension plans.

Tinubun Plc., a public limited company, operates two pension plans.

Pension Plan 1
The terms of the plan are as follows:

  1. Employees contribute 6% of their salaries to the plan.
  2. Tinubun Plc. contributes, currently, the same amount to the plan for the benefit of the employees.
  3. On retirement, employees are guaranteed a pension based on the number of years’ service with the company and their final salary.
  4. This plan was closed to new entrants from October 31, 2016, but it remains open for future service accrual for employees already in the scheme.

The following details relate to the plan in the year ending October 31, 2017:

Description Amount (₦’m)
Present value of obligation at Nov 1, 2016 200
Present value of obligation at Oct 31, 2017 240
Fair value of plan assets at Nov 1, 2016 190
Fair value of plan assets at Oct 31, 2017 225
Current service cost 20
Pension benefits paid 19
Total contributions paid to the scheme 17

Actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the Statement of Other Comprehensive Income.

Pension Plan 2
Under the terms of this plan, Tinubun Plc. does not guarantee any return on the contributions paid into the fund. The company’s legal and constructive obligation is limited to the amount contributed to the fund. The following details relate to this scheme:

Description Amount (₦’m)
Fair value of plan assets at Oct 31, 2017 21
Contributions paid by company 10
Contributions paid by employees 10

The discount rates for the two plans are as follows:

Date Discount Rate
October 31, 2017 6%
November 1, 2016 5%

Required:
a. Explain the nature and differences between a defined contribution plan and a defined benefit plan with specific reference to the company’s two schemes.
(7 Marks)

b. Show the accounting treatments for the two Tinubun Plc. pension plans for the year ended October 31, 2017 under IAS 19 ‘Employee Benefits’.
(8 Marks)

Total: 15 Marks

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2017 – L3 – Q5 – Employee Benefits (IAS 19)"

CR – May 2020 – L3 – Q2c – Defined Benefit Pension Plan

Recommend the accounting treatment for a defined benefit pension plan with supporting calculations.

Nzema prepares its financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) with a financial year end of 31 December 2018. On 1 January 2018, Nzema commenced a defined benefit pension plan for a number of head office employees. Under the pension scheme, Nzema has an obligation to provide these staff with agreed post-employment benefits. Nzema carries the actuarial and investment risk associated with the pension scheme.

The following information has been compiled from workings by Nzema’s accounting staff and actuarial reports for the 2018 financial year:

GH¢
Interest income on plan assets 16,500
Employer contributions to plan 550,000
Current service cost 600,000
Interest on plan liability 18,000
Fair value of plan assets at 31/12/2018 580,000
Present value of plan obligation at 31/12/2018 620,000

The Accountant was not sure which accounting standard to apply when accounting for the pension scheme. The only adjustment made to account for the scheme was to expense the company’s contributions of GH¢550,000 for the 2018 financial year in the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income and to credit the ‘Cash’ account.

Required:
Recommend, with appropriate calculations, the necessary accounting treatment for this accounting issue.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2020 – L3 – Q2c – Defined Benefit Pension Plan"

CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q3a – Defined Benefit Scheme Accounting

Recommend the correct accounting treatment of defined benefit scheme transactions for Meagya Ltd.

Meagya Ltd is a government business entity in Ghana. Meagya Ltd operates a defined benefit scheme which at 31 December 2019 was in deficit by GH¢120 million. Details for the current year are as follows:

GH¢’million
Current service cost 55
Cash contribution to the scheme 100
Benefits paid in the year 80
Net loss on curtailment 11
Gain on remeasurement of liability at 31 December 2020 9

The rate of interest applicable to corporate bonds was 5% at 31 December 2019. The cash contributions for the scheme have been correctly accounted for in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020. This is the only adjustment that has been made in respect of the scheme.

Required:
Recommend the correct accounting treatment of the above transactions to the directors of Meagya Ltd in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020, including financial statements extracts in accordance with IAS 19: Employee Benefits.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q3a – Defined Benefit Scheme Accounting"

CR – May 2018 – L3 – Q2a – IAS 19 Employee Benefits

Calculate the net actuarial gain/loss and net pension liability for a defined benefit plan under IAS 19.

Zumah Ltd operates a defined benefit pension plan for its employees. On 1 April 2015, the fair value of the pension plan assets was GH¢8,200,000, and the present value of the pension plan liabilities was GH¢8,500,000. The actuary estimated that the service cost for the year to 31 March 2016 was GH¢2,100,000. The pension plan paid GH¢500,000 to retired members, and Zumah Ltd paid GH¢1,900,000 in contributions to the pension plan in the year to 31 March 2016. The actuary estimated that the discount rate for the year to 31 March 2016 was 6%.

On 31 March 2016, Zumah Ltd announced improvements to the benefits offered by the pension plan to all its members. The actuary estimated that the past service cost associated with these improvements was GH¢2,000,000. At 31 March 2016, the fair value of the pension plan assets was GH¢10,200,000, and the present value of the pension plan liabilities (including the past service costs) was GH¢12,500,000.

Required:
In accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits:
i) Calculate the net actuarial gain or loss that will be included in Zumah Ltd’s other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2016. (3 marks)
ii) Calculate the net pension asset or liability that will be included in Zumah Ltd’s statement of financial position as at 31 March 2016. (2 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2018 – L3 – Q2a – IAS 19 Employee Benefits"

AAA – May 2018 – L3 – SA – Q1 – Audit of Complex Entities

Evaluate materiality reassessment, audit findings, and joint audit implications for Honey Group’s financial statements.

You are a manager in Puposola & Company (Chartered Accountants) responsible for the audit of the Honey Group (the Group), a quoted company. The Group’s main activity is steel manufacturing and it comprises of a parent company and three subsidiaries. Your firm currently audits all components of the Group. You are working on the audit of the Group’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2017. This morning, the audit engagement partner left a note for you.

“Hello

I have gone through the draft consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes which summarise the key audit findings and some background information.

Although, at the planning stage, materiality was initially determined to be N900,000, and was calculated based on the assumption that Honey Group is a high-risk client due to its listing status. However, due to a number of issues that arose during the audit, there is a need to revise the materiality level for the financial statements as a whole. The revised level of materiality should now be N700,000.

Thank you.”

The Group’s draft consolidated financial statements, with notes referenced to key audit findings, are shown below:

Draft Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

Note June 30, 2017 Draft (N’000) June 30, 2016 Actual (N’000)
Revenue 98,795 103,100
Cost of sales (75,250) (74,560)
Gross profit 23,545 28,540
Operating expenses (14,900) (17,500)
Operating profit 8,645 11,040
Share of profit of associate 1,010 900
Finance costs (380) (340)
Profit before tax 9,275 11,600
Taxation (3,200) (3,500)
Profit for the year 6,075 8,100
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax:
Gain on property revaluation 800 —–
Actuarial losses on defined benefit plan (1,100) (200)
Other comprehensive loss (300) (200)
Total comprehensive income for the year 5,775 7,900

Notes: Key Audit Findings on Statement of Comprehensive Income

  1. Revenue has been stable for all components of the Group with the exception of one subsidiary, Copesink Company, which witnessed a 25% decrease in revenue.
  2. Operating expenses for the year to June 2017 is shown net of profit on a property disposal of N2 million. Our evidence includes agreeing the cash receipts to the bank statement and sale documentation, and we have confirmed that the property has been removed from the non-current asset register. The audit junior noted when reviewing the sale document that there is an option to repurchase the property in five years’ time, but did not discuss the matter with management.
  3. The property revaluation relates to the Group’s head office. The audit team has not obtained evidence on the revaluation, as the gain was immaterial based on the initial calculation of materiality.
  4. The actuarial loss is attributed to an unexpected stock market crash. The Group’s pension plan is managed by Axial Company, a firm of independent fund managers who maintain the necessary accounting records relating to the plan. Axial Company has supplied written representation as to the value of the defined benefit plan’s assets and liabilities at June 30, 2017. No other audit work has been performed other than to agree the amount reported in the financial statements to supporting documentation supplied by Axial Company.

Draft Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Note June 30, 2017 Draft (N’000) June 30, 2016 Actual (N’000)
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 81,800 76,300
Goodwill 5,350 5,350
Investment in associate 4,230 4,230
Non-current assets held for sale 7,800
Total non-current assets 99,180 85,880
Current assets
Inventory 8,600 8,000
Receivables 8,540 7,800
Cash and cash equivalents 2,100 2,420
Total current assets 19,240 18,220
Total assets 118,420 104,100
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Share capital 12,500 12,500
Revaluation reserve 3,300 2,500
Retained earnings 33,600 29,400
Non-controlling interest 4,350 4,000
Total equity 53,750 48,400
Non-current liabilities
Defined benefit pension plan 10,820 9,250
Long-term borrowings 43,000 35,000
Deferred tax 1,950 1,350
Total non-current liabilities 55,770 45,600
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 6,200 7,300
Provisions 2,700 2,800
Total current liabilities 8,900 10,100
Total liabilities 64,670 55,700
Total equity and liabilities 118,420 104,100

Notes: Key Audit Findings on Statement of Financial Position

  1. The goodwill relates to each of the subsidiaries in the Group. Management has confirmed in writing that goodwill is stated correctly, and our other audit procedure was to arithmetically check the impairment review conducted by management.
  2. The associate is a 30% holding in Jamil Company, purchased to provide investment income. The audit team has not obtained evidence regarding the associate as there is no movement in the amount recognised in the statement of financial position.
  3. The non-current assets held for sale relate to a trading division of one of the subsidiaries, which represents one third of that subsidiary’s net assets. The sale of the division was announced in May 2017, and is expected to be complete by December 31, 2017. Audit evidence obtained includes a review of the sales agreement and confirmation from the buyer obtained in July 2017, that the sale will take place.
  4. Two of the Group’s subsidiaries are partly owned by shareholders external to the Group.
  5. A loan of N8 million was obtained in October 2016 at an interest rate of 2%, payable annually in arrears. The terms of the loan have been confirmed from the loan agreement provided by the bank. There was no repayment of the loan in the books as at prior year end.

Required:

a. Explain why auditors may need to reassess materiality as the audit progresses. (4 Marks)

b. Assess the implications of the key audit findings for the completion of the audit.

Note: Your assessment must consider whether the key audit findings indicate a risk of material misstatement. Where the key audit findings refer to audit evidence, you must also consider the adequacy of the audit evidence obtained, but you do not need to recommend further specific procedures. (18 Marks)

c. Discuss TWO advantages and TWO disadvantages of a joint audit being performed on the financial statements. (8 Marks)

(Total 30 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – May 2018 – L3 – SA – Q1 – Audit of Complex Entities"

CR – Nov 2017 – L3 – Q5 – Employee Benefits (IAS 19)

Explain and distinguish between defined contribution and defined benefit plans, providing IAS 19 accounting treatments for two pension plans.

Tinubun Plc., a public limited company, operates two pension plans.

Pension Plan 1
The terms of the plan are as follows:

  1. Employees contribute 6% of their salaries to the plan.
  2. Tinubun Plc. contributes, currently, the same amount to the plan for the benefit of the employees.
  3. On retirement, employees are guaranteed a pension based on the number of years’ service with the company and their final salary.
  4. This plan was closed to new entrants from October 31, 2016, but it remains open for future service accrual for employees already in the scheme.

The following details relate to the plan in the year ending October 31, 2017:

Description Amount (₦’m)
Present value of obligation at Nov 1, 2016 200
Present value of obligation at Oct 31, 2017 240
Fair value of plan assets at Nov 1, 2016 190
Fair value of plan assets at Oct 31, 2017 225
Current service cost 20
Pension benefits paid 19
Total contributions paid to the scheme 17

Actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the Statement of Other Comprehensive Income.

Pension Plan 2
Under the terms of this plan, Tinubun Plc. does not guarantee any return on the contributions paid into the fund. The company’s legal and constructive obligation is limited to the amount contributed to the fund. The following details relate to this scheme:

Description Amount (₦’m)
Fair value of plan assets at Oct 31, 2017 21
Contributions paid by company 10
Contributions paid by employees 10

The discount rates for the two plans are as follows:

Date Discount Rate
October 31, 2017 6%
November 1, 2016 5%

Required:
a. Explain the nature and differences between a defined contribution plan and a defined benefit plan with specific reference to the company’s two schemes.
(7 Marks)

b. Show the accounting treatments for the two Tinubun Plc. pension plans for the year ended October 31, 2017 under IAS 19 ‘Employee Benefits’.
(8 Marks)

Total: 15 Marks

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2017 – L3 – Q5 – Employee Benefits (IAS 19)"

CR – May 2020 – L3 – Q2c – Defined Benefit Pension Plan

Recommend the accounting treatment for a defined benefit pension plan with supporting calculations.

Nzema prepares its financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) with a financial year end of 31 December 2018. On 1 January 2018, Nzema commenced a defined benefit pension plan for a number of head office employees. Under the pension scheme, Nzema has an obligation to provide these staff with agreed post-employment benefits. Nzema carries the actuarial and investment risk associated with the pension scheme.

The following information has been compiled from workings by Nzema’s accounting staff and actuarial reports for the 2018 financial year:

GH¢
Interest income on plan assets 16,500
Employer contributions to plan 550,000
Current service cost 600,000
Interest on plan liability 18,000
Fair value of plan assets at 31/12/2018 580,000
Present value of plan obligation at 31/12/2018 620,000

The Accountant was not sure which accounting standard to apply when accounting for the pension scheme. The only adjustment made to account for the scheme was to expense the company’s contributions of GH¢550,000 for the 2018 financial year in the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income and to credit the ‘Cash’ account.

Required:
Recommend, with appropriate calculations, the necessary accounting treatment for this accounting issue.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2020 – L3 – Q2c – Defined Benefit Pension Plan"

CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q3a – Defined Benefit Scheme Accounting

Recommend the correct accounting treatment of defined benefit scheme transactions for Meagya Ltd.

Meagya Ltd is a government business entity in Ghana. Meagya Ltd operates a defined benefit scheme which at 31 December 2019 was in deficit by GH¢120 million. Details for the current year are as follows:

GH¢’million
Current service cost 55
Cash contribution to the scheme 100
Benefits paid in the year 80
Net loss on curtailment 11
Gain on remeasurement of liability at 31 December 2020 9

The rate of interest applicable to corporate bonds was 5% at 31 December 2019. The cash contributions for the scheme have been correctly accounted for in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020. This is the only adjustment that has been made in respect of the scheme.

Required:
Recommend the correct accounting treatment of the above transactions to the directors of Meagya Ltd in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020, including financial statements extracts in accordance with IAS 19: Employee Benefits.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q3a – Defined Benefit Scheme Accounting"

CR – May 2018 – L3 – Q2a – IAS 19 Employee Benefits

Calculate the net actuarial gain/loss and net pension liability for a defined benefit plan under IAS 19.

Zumah Ltd operates a defined benefit pension plan for its employees. On 1 April 2015, the fair value of the pension plan assets was GH¢8,200,000, and the present value of the pension plan liabilities was GH¢8,500,000. The actuary estimated that the service cost for the year to 31 March 2016 was GH¢2,100,000. The pension plan paid GH¢500,000 to retired members, and Zumah Ltd paid GH¢1,900,000 in contributions to the pension plan in the year to 31 March 2016. The actuary estimated that the discount rate for the year to 31 March 2016 was 6%.

On 31 March 2016, Zumah Ltd announced improvements to the benefits offered by the pension plan to all its members. The actuary estimated that the past service cost associated with these improvements was GH¢2,000,000. At 31 March 2016, the fair value of the pension plan assets was GH¢10,200,000, and the present value of the pension plan liabilities (including the past service costs) was GH¢12,500,000.

Required:
In accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits:
i) Calculate the net actuarial gain or loss that will be included in Zumah Ltd’s other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2016. (3 marks)
ii) Calculate the net pension asset or liability that will be included in Zumah Ltd’s statement of financial position as at 31 March 2016. (2 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2018 – L3 – Q2a – IAS 19 Employee Benefits"

error: Content is protected !!
Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan