Question Tag: Auditor Independence

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

AAA – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q2 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Discuss ethical and legal obligations of auditors regarding independence, confidentiality, money laundering, and client competition safeguards.

As an Audit Manager in a big audit firm in Nigeria, you were opportuned to attend a conference on Professional Ethics and Anti-Money Laundering in New York. On your return, one of the audit seniors went through the presentations and asked questions on some of the statements she noted in the presentations.

You are required to explain the following statements to her:

a. A good Auditor is an independent auditor. (5 Marks)
b. The Accountant’s normal professional duty of confidentiality to clients is not an adequate defence where money laundering is involved. (5 Marks)
c. Specific obligations for detecting and reporting suspicions of money laundering are placed on professional firms. (5 Marks)
d. A firm might act for two clients that are in direct competition with each other where there are acceptable safeguards. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q2 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AAA – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy

Evaluate internal and external business risks and outline pre-engagement activities for Sunsit Manufacturers Ltd.

The auditors of Sunsit Manufacturers Limited had disagreements with the company on various issues. This came to a climax with the withholding of a part of the payment of the last audit fees. The auditors had also been disenchanted with the undue pressures of management and have decided that, as a result of this and the withheld fees, they would disengage from the client.

The company’s chairman, in consideration of past issues, has considered the size of the audit firm as being partly responsible for its inability to manage adequately the pressures from the company’s accounting and management team. He has subsequently approached your firm for a change, and the partners have accepted the engagement despite the predecessor auditor’s declaration of the forfeiture of the firm’s outstanding fees and no further involvement with the client and issues relating to the company.

Required:

a. Following the background to the client and the engagement, evaluate the internal and external business risks that need to be considered with respect to the client. (10 Marks)

b. Discuss the pre-engagement activities to be carried on the client. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy"

AAA – Nov 2011 – L3 – SA – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Identifies a service inappropriate for an audit firm to provide due to independence and ethical concerns.

Which ONE of these services may not be appropriate for an audit firm?

  • A. Advising clients on corporate structures, recruitment, and other human capital needs
  • B. Giving necessary legal advice on tax returns including negotiation with the tax authorities
  • C. Acting as a receiver of the company’s operations on behalf of debenture holders and creditors of the company
  • D. Making detailed enquiries and gathering all necessary information to meet the clients’ specific needs
  • E. Advising clients on how best the business can be run and controlled including issues of accountability and management

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2011 – L3 – SA – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AA – Nov 2023 – L2 – Q3 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)

Evaluate ethical threats due to auditor relationships and actions, and recommend mitigations for compliance.

The following scenarios may threaten compliance with fundamental principles in auditing:

i. The audit supervisor is married to the daughter of the Managing Director of the client company;

ii. The audit firm’s Senior Partner holds shares in the client company;

iii. The assurance firm also provides valuation services, internal audit services, and taxation services to an assurance client;

iv. The assurance firm earns more than 50% of its annual revenue from one assurance client; and

v. The firm obtained motor vehicle financing from a client bank for its staff.

Required:

a. Explain why compliance with fundamental principles in auditing may be threatened in each of the above FIVE circumstances. (10 Marks)

b. Explain FIVE ethical requirements that would reduce or mitigate the threats to compliance with the fundamental principles in the above FIVE circumstances. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2023 – L2 – Q3 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)"

MGE – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Corporate Governance

Ethical and governance issues in appointing auditors with familial ties to company management.

ROC Company Plc. manufactures aluminium (stainless) household equipment. Its plant is located by Alobe river, which is the source of water for the community. The company currently has the largest share of the market on the West African Coast and plans to expand its operations to East African and South African markets.

At the 26th Annual General Meeting (AGM), shareholders approved the appointment of Adeola & Partners as External Auditors to the company. The Managing Partner of Adeola & Partners, Sir Segun Adeola, is a nephew of the Managing Director of ROC Company Plc. The appointment of Adeola & Partners as External Auditors to ROC Company was facilitated by the Managing Director, who did not disclose his relationship with Sir Segun Adeola to the company’s board.

At a recent board meeting, the Managing Director of ROC expressed concern that so much resources were expended towards satisfying the interest of the community at the expense of the company’s shareholders. According to him, shareholders are the primary stakeholders of the company, and their interest should be given the highest priority. He further opined that although other stakeholders are important to the company but only to the extent that ROC needs them. Consequently, the board resolved that henceforth, the company should not spend more than 0.5% of its Profit After Tax (PAT) on other stakeholders.

At the peak of the company’s production cycle, one of its underground waste tanks ruptured, and a large quantity of chemical waste leaked into Alobe river. This led to the destruction of aquatic life and contamination of neighbouring farmlands. This catastrophic event devastated the community as many farmers and fishermen lost their sources of livelihood. The community’s major source of drinking water was also contaminated.

The leadership of Alobe River Community Association approached the management of ROC Company Plc. and requested them to pay huge sums as compensation to the affected people and also to construct ten bore holes for the community. The management, however, informed the community leaders that based on the resolution of their board, expenditure on the issue would be limited to only 0.5% of profit after tax at the end of the year, which was projected to be far less than the amount of compensation demanded by the community. As a result, all discussions with the leadership of the community broke down.

The youths of the community responded with a sit-in protest, leading to a blockade of the company’s gate and disruption of its operations. The board of the company is now seeking immediate and amicable resolution of this problem.

While this was going on, the company suffered a major fire outbreak in its second factory, destroying its main furnace, machines and a large quantity of its finished goods. Some of the workers were severely burnt while attempting to put out the fire at the factory’s major warehouse. This event culminated in production shutdown at the second factory and temporary disengagement of several skilled workers as well as some casual staff. Fortunately, the company is covered by comprehensive fire and workers compensation insurance policies with Nagode Risk and Life Assurance Plc.

Required:
a. As a Strategic Risk Consultant of ROC Company Plc. you are to evaluate the adequacy of the risk management processes, including its information and communication systems. (8 Marks)

b. Evaluate the company’s residual risks in contrast to the management’s risk appetite. (7 Marks)

c. Using the stakeholders theory, evaluate the Managing Director’s position. Are there other stakeholders important to the company? (9 Marks)

d. Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved in the scenario described above. (6 Marks)


Answer:

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MGE – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Corporate Governance"

AA – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q5 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors

Explain threats to auditor independence and provide examples of each.

The ICAN Professional Code of Conduct and Guide for Members gives a list of threats to auditors’ independence, which may impair integrity, objectivity, or the good reputation of the profession.

Required:

Explain the following threats and give TWO examples each of circumstances that may lead to the threats:

a. Self-Interest (3 Marks)

b. Self-Review (3 Marks)

c. Advocacy (3 Marks)

d. Familiarity (3 Marks)

e. Intimidation (3 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q5 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors"

AA – May 2021 – L2 – Q6 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)

Explanation of auditor independence threats, including fees, financial interest, contingent fees, and personal relationships.

Wakaso Nigeria Limited has experienced serious labour turnover which has affected the business of the company in the last twelve months. The most frustrating issue was the resignation of a well-tested Financial Controller of the company close to year-end. Wakaso management is noted for timely financial reporting and rendering of tax returns due to the efficiency and effectiveness of the Financial Controller who was also involved in the preparation of tax computations. The company has been finding it difficult to quickly recruit a new Financial Controller that will match the technical ability of the former accountant. The Managing Director of the company has invited the company’s external auditors to a meeting, intimating them of the plan to employ their services to complete the write-up of the books of accounts and management account pending when they employ a good chartered accountant to handle the financial operations of the company.

The company’s management, in order to ensure timely reporting, has also informed the auditors that to save time and meet cost of operations, the firm’s staff will be accommodated in a five-star hotel with a mouth-watering offer of payment in lieu of feeding as recommended by the audit partner. In addition, the previous year’s audit fee will be doubled and an additional twenty percent payment made if the management accounts and audit work could be completed within three weeks.

The partner of the firm has rejected the offers on the grounds of possible threat to independence. The Managing Director complained to you, as his brother, lamenting that accountants are not good businessmen and uncooperative.

Required:

Discuss the following:

a. Meaning of threats to independence (2 Marks)
b. In relation to independence of auditors:
i. Fees and pricing (4 Marks)
ii. Financial interest (4 Marks)
iii. Contingent fees (2 Marks)
iv. Family and personal relationship (4 Marks)
c. The reasons why the preparation of accounting records and management accounts constitutes a threat to the independence of the auditors. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2021 – L2 – Q6 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)"

AA – May 2021 – L2 – Q1 – Regulatory Framework for Auditing

Analysis of audit risks and control objectives in a joint audit and compliance scenario.

Chukwuemeka & Co. (Chartered Accountants) has been auditors to GED Manufacturing Nigeria Plc. There have been some regulatory and compliance issues for which the company was sanctioned and paid penalties to the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria.

At the board of directors meeting to consider the last annual report audited by the firm, some of the previous problems caused by the auditors were raised and discussed. Following the reoccurrence of such issues, it was proposed that another audit firm be engaged in addition to the present firm.

To achieve their objective, a bigger firm that has international affiliation was considered to take a leading role in a joint audit arrangement and to ensure appropriate compliance. Your firm has been approached for the appointment. A meeting was scheduled between your firm, Chukwuemeka & Co., and the executive management of GED Manufacturing Nigeria Plc.

After the meeting, your firm was subsequently appointed, and the necessary formalities were properly followed. Your partner has directed that you liaise with Chukwuemeka & Co. to obtain the necessary materials for the preparation of the audit and that you review the prior year working papers to understand the issues. Your assessment of the documents obtained from the other auditor revealed the following, amongst others:

(i) The work done on the process of dispatch of goods and invoicing was not considered sufficient and appropriate.

(ii) The IT operations of the company had weak controls such that it was possible for some staff to override some of the existing controls.

Required:

a. Explain the risks inherent in the dispatch of goods and invoicing. (10 Marks)

b. Discuss the control objectives and principal controls that are relevant to the process of dispatch of goods and invoicing. (10 Marks)

c. Explain the limitations of a joint audit. (5 Marks)

d. Discuss the benefits of audit carried out by an internationally affiliated audit firm. (10 Marks)

e. Explain briefly the importance of audit working papers. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2021 – L2 – Q1 – Regulatory Framework for Auditing"

AA – May 2023 – L2 – SA – Q4 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Identify threats to auditor independence, assess circumstances affecting independence, and suggest safeguards.

Cringe Professional Services has been auditing Kogberegbe Limited for about 20 years. Being a limited liability company, no regulation imposed restriction on the tenure of the auditors.

The firm also provides taxation and valuation services for the company. The company has just adopted International Financial Reporting Standards and has employed the services of Cringe Professional Services for conversion services from local GAAP. The firm experienced a high staff turnover in the year and has no choice but to include the daughter of the Managing Director of the company as part of the engagement team, although as a support staff.

Management has indicated in confidence that the audit fee for the year will not be increased, except the firm can guarantee them that no adverse management letter will be issued and no loss will be made by the company as they are planning to go to the capital market to raise capital for expansion. With poor management letter and loss position, they believe that it will be difficult to achieve this.

At the end of the audit exercise, the company made a huge profit even with unfavorable economic climate, thanks to challenges associated with COVID-19. There was public outcry because it was believed that the financial statements of the company were misstated, and the auditor was accused of negligence. This necessitated the Financial Reporting Council to conduct an investigation on the company. It was found that the company restructured its debt portfolio, which was denominated in foreign currency with attendant foreign exchange risks to Naira.

The company restructured a huge intercompany loan to a 7-year principal payment holiday with principal repayment commencing September 30, 2025. The interest on the loan for the period was not brought into the books of account.

The company accrued for a NGN70.60m benefit from a transaction in 2019 from operating fees. This has been treated as income in the financial statements.

There were identified defaults by the company in relation to the payment of interests and principal on its outstanding loans and borrowings.

There were adverse ratios in the company’s financial performance ratios in the year due to interest on borrowings from financial institutions and related parties.

A revisit of the operating performance for the year revealed the following:

  • The entity made an operating loss of N1.22 billion.
  • It generated negative operating cashflows of N2.15 billion.
  • There was positive working capital as the current assets exceeded the current liabilities by N1.2 billion in the year.
  • The net assets position of the company was in the negative as the total liabilities exceeded the total assets by N9.8 billion.

The Financial Reporting Council concluded that there were threats to the auditors’ independence, hence the professional firm was penalized for that.

A concerned staff of the company asks you of the implications of the issues raised by the Financial Reporting Council.

Required:

a. Identify and explain the threats to independence of the auditor in the above scenario. (7 Marks)

b. Discuss circumstances that could give rise to threats to independence. (7 Marks)

c. Suggest appropriate safeguards which could be put in place to mitigate the identified threats. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2023 – L2 – SA – Q4 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AA – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q7 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)

Discussing ethical considerations in providing non-audit services to an audit client and fundamental principles of professional ethics.

Ade, Bala, Chris and Co. are the auditors to Victory Ventures Limited, a chemical manufacturing company. The firm has been carrying out statutory audits for this client for several years. Recently, the company asked the firm to carry out tax planning and compliance advisory services and also perform financial reporting valuation services for the company.

Required:
a. Discuss ethical issues the firm will need to take into consideration in accepting to carry out the new assignments for the client. (5 Marks)
b. Describe the FIVE fundamental ethical principles according to ICAN Professional Code of Conduct and Guide for Members and IFAC Code of Ethics. (5 Marks)
c. Describe the differences between rules-based and principles-based approaches to professional ethics. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q7 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)"

AAA – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q2 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Discuss ethical and legal obligations of auditors regarding independence, confidentiality, money laundering, and client competition safeguards.

As an Audit Manager in a big audit firm in Nigeria, you were opportuned to attend a conference on Professional Ethics and Anti-Money Laundering in New York. On your return, one of the audit seniors went through the presentations and asked questions on some of the statements she noted in the presentations.

You are required to explain the following statements to her:

a. A good Auditor is an independent auditor. (5 Marks)
b. The Accountant’s normal professional duty of confidentiality to clients is not an adequate defence where money laundering is involved. (5 Marks)
c. Specific obligations for detecting and reporting suspicions of money laundering are placed on professional firms. (5 Marks)
d. A firm might act for two clients that are in direct competition with each other where there are acceptable safeguards. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q2 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AAA – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy

Evaluate internal and external business risks and outline pre-engagement activities for Sunsit Manufacturers Ltd.

The auditors of Sunsit Manufacturers Limited had disagreements with the company on various issues. This came to a climax with the withholding of a part of the payment of the last audit fees. The auditors had also been disenchanted with the undue pressures of management and have decided that, as a result of this and the withheld fees, they would disengage from the client.

The company’s chairman, in consideration of past issues, has considered the size of the audit firm as being partly responsible for its inability to manage adequately the pressures from the company’s accounting and management team. He has subsequently approached your firm for a change, and the partners have accepted the engagement despite the predecessor auditor’s declaration of the forfeiture of the firm’s outstanding fees and no further involvement with the client and issues relating to the company.

Required:

a. Following the background to the client and the engagement, evaluate the internal and external business risks that need to be considered with respect to the client. (10 Marks)

b. Discuss the pre-engagement activities to be carried on the client. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy"

AAA – Nov 2011 – L3 – SA – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Identifies a service inappropriate for an audit firm to provide due to independence and ethical concerns.

Which ONE of these services may not be appropriate for an audit firm?

  • A. Advising clients on corporate structures, recruitment, and other human capital needs
  • B. Giving necessary legal advice on tax returns including negotiation with the tax authorities
  • C. Acting as a receiver of the company’s operations on behalf of debenture holders and creditors of the company
  • D. Making detailed enquiries and gathering all necessary information to meet the clients’ specific needs
  • E. Advising clients on how best the business can be run and controlled including issues of accountability and management

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2011 – L3 – SA – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AA – Nov 2023 – L2 – Q3 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)

Evaluate ethical threats due to auditor relationships and actions, and recommend mitigations for compliance.

The following scenarios may threaten compliance with fundamental principles in auditing:

i. The audit supervisor is married to the daughter of the Managing Director of the client company;

ii. The audit firm’s Senior Partner holds shares in the client company;

iii. The assurance firm also provides valuation services, internal audit services, and taxation services to an assurance client;

iv. The assurance firm earns more than 50% of its annual revenue from one assurance client; and

v. The firm obtained motor vehicle financing from a client bank for its staff.

Required:

a. Explain why compliance with fundamental principles in auditing may be threatened in each of the above FIVE circumstances. (10 Marks)

b. Explain FIVE ethical requirements that would reduce or mitigate the threats to compliance with the fundamental principles in the above FIVE circumstances. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2023 – L2 – Q3 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)"

MGE – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Corporate Governance

Ethical and governance issues in appointing auditors with familial ties to company management.

ROC Company Plc. manufactures aluminium (stainless) household equipment. Its plant is located by Alobe river, which is the source of water for the community. The company currently has the largest share of the market on the West African Coast and plans to expand its operations to East African and South African markets.

At the 26th Annual General Meeting (AGM), shareholders approved the appointment of Adeola & Partners as External Auditors to the company. The Managing Partner of Adeola & Partners, Sir Segun Adeola, is a nephew of the Managing Director of ROC Company Plc. The appointment of Adeola & Partners as External Auditors to ROC Company was facilitated by the Managing Director, who did not disclose his relationship with Sir Segun Adeola to the company’s board.

At a recent board meeting, the Managing Director of ROC expressed concern that so much resources were expended towards satisfying the interest of the community at the expense of the company’s shareholders. According to him, shareholders are the primary stakeholders of the company, and their interest should be given the highest priority. He further opined that although other stakeholders are important to the company but only to the extent that ROC needs them. Consequently, the board resolved that henceforth, the company should not spend more than 0.5% of its Profit After Tax (PAT) on other stakeholders.

At the peak of the company’s production cycle, one of its underground waste tanks ruptured, and a large quantity of chemical waste leaked into Alobe river. This led to the destruction of aquatic life and contamination of neighbouring farmlands. This catastrophic event devastated the community as many farmers and fishermen lost their sources of livelihood. The community’s major source of drinking water was also contaminated.

The leadership of Alobe River Community Association approached the management of ROC Company Plc. and requested them to pay huge sums as compensation to the affected people and also to construct ten bore holes for the community. The management, however, informed the community leaders that based on the resolution of their board, expenditure on the issue would be limited to only 0.5% of profit after tax at the end of the year, which was projected to be far less than the amount of compensation demanded by the community. As a result, all discussions with the leadership of the community broke down.

The youths of the community responded with a sit-in protest, leading to a blockade of the company’s gate and disruption of its operations. The board of the company is now seeking immediate and amicable resolution of this problem.

While this was going on, the company suffered a major fire outbreak in its second factory, destroying its main furnace, machines and a large quantity of its finished goods. Some of the workers were severely burnt while attempting to put out the fire at the factory’s major warehouse. This event culminated in production shutdown at the second factory and temporary disengagement of several skilled workers as well as some casual staff. Fortunately, the company is covered by comprehensive fire and workers compensation insurance policies with Nagode Risk and Life Assurance Plc.

Required:
a. As a Strategic Risk Consultant of ROC Company Plc. you are to evaluate the adequacy of the risk management processes, including its information and communication systems. (8 Marks)

b. Evaluate the company’s residual risks in contrast to the management’s risk appetite. (7 Marks)

c. Using the stakeholders theory, evaluate the Managing Director’s position. Are there other stakeholders important to the company? (9 Marks)

d. Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved in the scenario described above. (6 Marks)


Answer:

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MGE – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Corporate Governance"

AA – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q5 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors

Explain threats to auditor independence and provide examples of each.

The ICAN Professional Code of Conduct and Guide for Members gives a list of threats to auditors’ independence, which may impair integrity, objectivity, or the good reputation of the profession.

Required:

Explain the following threats and give TWO examples each of circumstances that may lead to the threats:

a. Self-Interest (3 Marks)

b. Self-Review (3 Marks)

c. Advocacy (3 Marks)

d. Familiarity (3 Marks)

e. Intimidation (3 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q5 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors"

AA – May 2021 – L2 – Q6 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)

Explanation of auditor independence threats, including fees, financial interest, contingent fees, and personal relationships.

Wakaso Nigeria Limited has experienced serious labour turnover which has affected the business of the company in the last twelve months. The most frustrating issue was the resignation of a well-tested Financial Controller of the company close to year-end. Wakaso management is noted for timely financial reporting and rendering of tax returns due to the efficiency and effectiveness of the Financial Controller who was also involved in the preparation of tax computations. The company has been finding it difficult to quickly recruit a new Financial Controller that will match the technical ability of the former accountant. The Managing Director of the company has invited the company’s external auditors to a meeting, intimating them of the plan to employ their services to complete the write-up of the books of accounts and management account pending when they employ a good chartered accountant to handle the financial operations of the company.

The company’s management, in order to ensure timely reporting, has also informed the auditors that to save time and meet cost of operations, the firm’s staff will be accommodated in a five-star hotel with a mouth-watering offer of payment in lieu of feeding as recommended by the audit partner. In addition, the previous year’s audit fee will be doubled and an additional twenty percent payment made if the management accounts and audit work could be completed within three weeks.

The partner of the firm has rejected the offers on the grounds of possible threat to independence. The Managing Director complained to you, as his brother, lamenting that accountants are not good businessmen and uncooperative.

Required:

Discuss the following:

a. Meaning of threats to independence (2 Marks)
b. In relation to independence of auditors:
i. Fees and pricing (4 Marks)
ii. Financial interest (4 Marks)
iii. Contingent fees (2 Marks)
iv. Family and personal relationship (4 Marks)
c. The reasons why the preparation of accounting records and management accounts constitutes a threat to the independence of the auditors. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2021 – L2 – Q6 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)"

AA – May 2021 – L2 – Q1 – Regulatory Framework for Auditing

Analysis of audit risks and control objectives in a joint audit and compliance scenario.

Chukwuemeka & Co. (Chartered Accountants) has been auditors to GED Manufacturing Nigeria Plc. There have been some regulatory and compliance issues for which the company was sanctioned and paid penalties to the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria.

At the board of directors meeting to consider the last annual report audited by the firm, some of the previous problems caused by the auditors were raised and discussed. Following the reoccurrence of such issues, it was proposed that another audit firm be engaged in addition to the present firm.

To achieve their objective, a bigger firm that has international affiliation was considered to take a leading role in a joint audit arrangement and to ensure appropriate compliance. Your firm has been approached for the appointment. A meeting was scheduled between your firm, Chukwuemeka & Co., and the executive management of GED Manufacturing Nigeria Plc.

After the meeting, your firm was subsequently appointed, and the necessary formalities were properly followed. Your partner has directed that you liaise with Chukwuemeka & Co. to obtain the necessary materials for the preparation of the audit and that you review the prior year working papers to understand the issues. Your assessment of the documents obtained from the other auditor revealed the following, amongst others:

(i) The work done on the process of dispatch of goods and invoicing was not considered sufficient and appropriate.

(ii) The IT operations of the company had weak controls such that it was possible for some staff to override some of the existing controls.

Required:

a. Explain the risks inherent in the dispatch of goods and invoicing. (10 Marks)

b. Discuss the control objectives and principal controls that are relevant to the process of dispatch of goods and invoicing. (10 Marks)

c. Explain the limitations of a joint audit. (5 Marks)

d. Discuss the benefits of audit carried out by an internationally affiliated audit firm. (10 Marks)

e. Explain briefly the importance of audit working papers. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2021 – L2 – Q1 – Regulatory Framework for Auditing"

AA – May 2023 – L2 – SA – Q4 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Identify threats to auditor independence, assess circumstances affecting independence, and suggest safeguards.

Cringe Professional Services has been auditing Kogberegbe Limited for about 20 years. Being a limited liability company, no regulation imposed restriction on the tenure of the auditors.

The firm also provides taxation and valuation services for the company. The company has just adopted International Financial Reporting Standards and has employed the services of Cringe Professional Services for conversion services from local GAAP. The firm experienced a high staff turnover in the year and has no choice but to include the daughter of the Managing Director of the company as part of the engagement team, although as a support staff.

Management has indicated in confidence that the audit fee for the year will not be increased, except the firm can guarantee them that no adverse management letter will be issued and no loss will be made by the company as they are planning to go to the capital market to raise capital for expansion. With poor management letter and loss position, they believe that it will be difficult to achieve this.

At the end of the audit exercise, the company made a huge profit even with unfavorable economic climate, thanks to challenges associated with COVID-19. There was public outcry because it was believed that the financial statements of the company were misstated, and the auditor was accused of negligence. This necessitated the Financial Reporting Council to conduct an investigation on the company. It was found that the company restructured its debt portfolio, which was denominated in foreign currency with attendant foreign exchange risks to Naira.

The company restructured a huge intercompany loan to a 7-year principal payment holiday with principal repayment commencing September 30, 2025. The interest on the loan for the period was not brought into the books of account.

The company accrued for a NGN70.60m benefit from a transaction in 2019 from operating fees. This has been treated as income in the financial statements.

There were identified defaults by the company in relation to the payment of interests and principal on its outstanding loans and borrowings.

There were adverse ratios in the company’s financial performance ratios in the year due to interest on borrowings from financial institutions and related parties.

A revisit of the operating performance for the year revealed the following:

  • The entity made an operating loss of N1.22 billion.
  • It generated negative operating cashflows of N2.15 billion.
  • There was positive working capital as the current assets exceeded the current liabilities by N1.2 billion in the year.
  • The net assets position of the company was in the negative as the total liabilities exceeded the total assets by N9.8 billion.

The Financial Reporting Council concluded that there were threats to the auditors’ independence, hence the professional firm was penalized for that.

A concerned staff of the company asks you of the implications of the issues raised by the Financial Reporting Council.

Required:

a. Identify and explain the threats to independence of the auditor in the above scenario. (7 Marks)

b. Discuss circumstances that could give rise to threats to independence. (7 Marks)

c. Suggest appropriate safeguards which could be put in place to mitigate the identified threats. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – May 2023 – L2 – SA – Q4 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AA – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q7 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)

Discussing ethical considerations in providing non-audit services to an audit client and fundamental principles of professional ethics.

Ade, Bala, Chris and Co. are the auditors to Victory Ventures Limited, a chemical manufacturing company. The firm has been carrying out statutory audits for this client for several years. Recently, the company asked the firm to carry out tax planning and compliance advisory services and also perform financial reporting valuation services for the company.

Required:
a. Discuss ethical issues the firm will need to take into consideration in accepting to carry out the new assignments for the client. (5 Marks)
b. Describe the FIVE fundamental ethical principles according to ICAN Professional Code of Conduct and Guide for Members and IFAC Code of Ethics. (5 Marks)
c. Describe the differences between rules-based and principles-based approaches to professional ethics. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q7 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)"

error: Content is protected !!
Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan